CARE Advisory Research

and Training Ltd.

Confidential

October 22, 2021.

To,

Anand Rathi Wealth Limited (formerly known as Anand Rathi Wealth Services Limited)

Express Zone, A wing, 10th floor,

Western Express Highway,

Goregaon, Mumbai – 400 063,

Maharashtra, India

Dear Sir / Madam,

Update of Research Report on Wealth Management Industry for M/s. Anand Rathi Wealth

Limited.

Please refer to your mandate letter dated September 23, 2021 regarding the above mentioned assignment.

With reference to above mandate, we hereby forward the final Research Report on Wealth Management Industry for M/s. Anand Rathi Wealth Limited.

Kindly acknowledge the receipt.

Thanking you.

Yours faithfully,

(Mehul Parekh)

Consultant

Enclosure: As Above.

Wholly Owned Subsidiary of CARE Ratings Ltd. (Formerly known as Credit Analysis & Research Ltd.)

REGISTERED OFFICE : 4th Floor, Godrej Coliseum, Somaiya Hospital Road, Off Eastern Express Highway, Sion (E), Mumbai 400 022.

Tel.: +91-22-6754 3456 | Fax: +91-22-6754 3457

CIN-U74999MH0216PLC285575

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Industry Research Report

On

WEALTH MANAGEMENT

By

October 2021

A Division of CARE Advisory Research and Training Limited.

A-1102/1103, 11th Floor, Kanakia Wall Street, Chakala, Andheri - Kurla Rd,

Andheri East, Mumbai- 400093

Contact No. 022 – 6837 4462/ E-mail: mehul.parekh@care-cart.com

Page 1 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

DISCLAIMER

This report is prepared by CARE Advisory, division of CARE Advisory Research and Training Limited (CART). CARE Advisory has taken utmost care to ensure accuracy and objectivity while developing this report based on information available in public domain. However, neither the accuracy nor completeness of information contained in this report is guaranteed. CARE Advisory operates independently of CARE ratings Limited and this report does not contain any confidential information obtained by ratings division, which they may have obtained in the regular course of operations. The opinion expressed in this report cannot be compared to the rating assigned to the company within this industry by the ratings division. The opinion expressed is also not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold an instrument.

CARE Advisory is not responsible for any errors or omissions in analysis/inferences/views or for results obtained from the use of information contained in this report and especially states that CARE (including all divisions) has no financial liability whatsoever to the user of this product. This report is for the information of the intended recipients only and no part of this report may be published or reproduced in any form or manner without prior written permission of CARE Advisory.

Page 2 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

List of Abbreviation

Abbreviations

 

Full Form

 

 

AAUM

 

Average Assets under Management

 

 

AMCs

 

Asset management companies

 

 

AOP

 

Association Of Persons

 

 

APAC

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

ARN

 

Amfi Registration Number

 

 

AUM

 

Assets under Management

 

 

BCG

 

Boston Consulting Group

 

 

Bn.

 

Billion

 

 

BOI

 

Body Of Individuals

 

 

CAGR

 

Compounded Annual Growth Rate

Cr.

 

Crore

 

 

CART

 

CARE Advisory Research & Training Limited

CSO

 

Central Statistics Organization

 

 

ELSS

 

Equity Linked Savings Scheme

 

 

EMEA

 

Europe, Middle East, and Africa

 

 

ETFs

 

Exchange Traded Funds

EUIN

 

Employee Unique Identity Number

 

 

FDI

 

Foreign Direct Investment

 

 

FIIs

 

Foreign institutional investors

 

 

FY

 

Financial Year

 

 

G SEC

 

Government Security

 

 

GDP

 

Gross Domestic Product

 

 

GST

 

Goods and Services Tax

 

 

HUF

 

Hindu Undivided Family

 

 

IFAs

 

Independent financial advisors

 

 

IIA

 

India Industries Association

 

 

IMF

 

International Monetary Fund

 

 

IT

 

Income-Tax

 

 

LIC

 

Life Insurance Corporation of India

 

 

Mn.

 

Million

MOSPI

 

Ministry Of Statistics And Programme Implementation

 

 

MT

 

Metric Tonnes

 

 

PFCE

 

Private Final Consumption Expenditure

 

 

PMJDY

 

Pradhan Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana

PMJJBY

 

Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana

 

 

PMS

 

Portfolio Management Services

PMSBY

 

Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana

 

 

 

Page 3 of 98

 

 

 

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PP MLD

 

Principal Protected Market Linked Debentures

 

 

 

 

 

 

PPP

 

Public Private Partnership

 

 

 

 

 

 

PPP

 

Purchasing Power Parity

 

 

 

 

 

 

PSU

 

Public Sector Undertaking

 

 

 

 

 

 

QAAUM

 

Quarterly Average Assets Under Management

 

 

 

 

 

 

QIP

 

Qualified Institutional Placement

 

 

 

 

 

 

RBI

 

Reserve Bank of India

 

 

 

 

 

 

RBI

 

Reserve Bank Of India

 

 

 

 

 

 

RERA

 

Real Estate Regulatory Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

SEBI

 

Securities and Exchange Board of India

 

 

 

 

 

 

SME

 

Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises

 

 

 

 

 

 

SRO

 

Self-regulatory organization

 

 

 

 

 

 

UHNH

 

Ultra-High Networth Households

 

 

 

 

 

 

UHNI

 

Ultra-High Net-Worth Individual

 

 

 

 

 

 

UTI

 

Unit Trust of India

 

 

WEO

 

World Economic Outlook

 

 

 

 

 

 

WMS

 

Wealth management services

 

 

 

 

 

 

YoY

 

Year on Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 4 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

6

ECONOMIC OUTLOOK

8

INDIAN CAPITAL MARKET OUTLOOK

15

INDIAN WEALTH MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

17

KEY GROWTH DRIVERS

21

EVOLUTION OF DIGITAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT

38

KEY INDUSTRY PLAYER OVERVIEW

42

OUTLOOK FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY IN INDIA

50

PRODUCT OVERVIEW

65

WEALTH MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY IN INDIA

68

CLASSIFICATION & CHARACTERISTICS OF ULTRA HNI & HNI

86

GLOBAL OVERVIEW

89

OUTLOOK FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY IN INDIA-OVERALL

94

Page 5 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CARE Ratings estimated India’s GDP growth rate at 9.2% for the FY2022. India’s growth outlook has improved significantly and the COVID-19 vaccination drive will help the economic rebound.

Nearly 890 million COVID-19 vaccine doses have so far been administered in the country till 30th September 2021. According to the ministry’s data, a total of 650 million first doses and 240 million second doses of the vaccine have been administered across the country

More than 50% of the Indian population is under 25 years of age and this is the largest and fastest-growing adult segment across the globe which represents a great opportunity for the wealth management industry. Favourable demographics, rising income levels and a burgeoning affluent middle class provides a strong customer base for wealth management sector.

Total number of accounts (or folios as per mutual fund parlance) as on June 30, 2021 stood at 102.6 million, while the number of folios under Equity, ELSS and Balanced schemes, wherein the maximum investment is from retail segment stood at 92.8 million.

Number of millionaires in 2020 and 2025 (Selected countries)

 

 

 

 

Number (thousand)

 

 

Change

 

 

CAGR

 

 

Country

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2025

 

 

(%)

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

India

 

 

698

 

 

1,269

 

 

82%

 

 

12.70%

 

 

World

 

 

56,084

 

 

84,014

 

 

49%

 

 

8.42%

 

The number of Millionaires in India are expected to almost double at CAGR of 12.70% by CY25, most of the increase will be driven by young Indians getting wealthier.

Investors in India are increasingly changing investment behavior from physical savings e.g. real estate and gold towards financial assets such as equity, bonds and alternate investments that has higher potential for wealth creation. Lower expected returns on physical assets have been one of the major factors for shift in investments preference of investors towards financial products and have increased post demonetization.

Even the reduction in bank deposit rates in the past year has led to a shift in investment to mutual funds and the stock markets. Such financial savings will find its way into mutual funds, owing to increased awareness of the product.

Assets managed by the Indian mutual fund industry has increased from Rs. 27.74 trillion in September 2020 to Rs. 37.41 trillion in September 2021. That represents 34.84% increase in assets over September 2020. (Assets are measured as average assets for the month).

Page 6 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Even after such high growth India has the lowest mutual fund penetration globally. The total Assets under Management (AUM) to GDP ratio of India stands at a mere 16.0%, which is below the global average of 63.0% in CY 2020. Countries like US have AUM to GDP ratios of

over 100%.(Source – Statista.com, CARE Advisory Research & Training Limited (CART))

Changing Wealth Management Operating Models in the future – As per CART, due to increasing use of technology, many organizations are shifting to digital platforms to provide services to clients such as Robo-advisors which have successfully leveraged the demand for user friendly and interconnected digital services and deployed a simple streamlined digital experience for clients. These firms have created direct-to-consumer models to provide the basic elements of wealth management advice, minimizing the traditional reliance on human advisors. Digital platforms automatically invest and rebalance according to clients’ goals and risk tolerances without human interference which will remain a strong reason for growth and this trend will continue in the future.

Wealth held by individuals is expected to reach approx. Rs. 812 trillion by FY25 at a steady CAGR of 11.77% per annum from Rs 465 trillion in FY20.

India is expected to be the fourth largest private wealth market globally by 2028.

The Association of Mutual Funds in India (AMFI) is targeting nearly three-fold growth in AUM to Rs. 95 trillion (US$ 1.26 trillion) and more than three times growth in investor accounts to 130 million by 2025.

Global wealth is projected to rise by 39% over the next five years, reaching USD 583 trillion by 2025. Low- and middle-income countries are responsible for 42% of the growth, although they account for just 33% of current wealth. Wealth per adult is projected to increase by 31%, passing the watershed mark of USD 100,000. The number of millionaires will also grow markedly over the next five years, reaching 84 million by CY25, while the number of UHNWIs should reach 344,000 by CY25.

CART believes that factors such as favorable demographic profile with a young working population rise in income levels, increasing financial literacy, and retail participation and buoyancy in capital markets supporting equity AUM, are expected to drive the growth of the mutual fund industry in the long term which ultimately will lead to the growth of Wealth Management Industry. Hence, the mutual fund industry in the country provides huge scope for growth and development.

Page 7 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

ECONOMIC OUTLOOK

1.1 Global Economy

The world economy contracted by -3.1% in CY2020 owing to the global outbreak of Covid-19. However, it is expected to grow by 5.9% in CY2021 and moderate to a growth rate of 4.9% in CY2022 on the back of vaccination inoculation drive and resumption of economic activities as pandemic induced restrictions are eased across the globe. The base effect of negative growth rate in 2020 has resulted in higher growth in 2021 across the spectrum of countries though the impact varies.

Exhibit 1: Global Growth Outlook Projections (in %)

 

Country/Group

 

 

2020

 

 

2021E

 

 

2022E

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

World Output

 

 

–3.1

 

 

5.9

 

 

4.9

 

 

Advanced Economies

 

–4.5

5.2

 

4.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

 

–3.4

 

 

6.0

 

 

5.2

 

 

Euro Area

 

–6.3

5.0

 

4.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Japan

 

 

–4.6

 

 

2.4

 

 

3.2

 

 

United Kingdom

 

–9.8

6.8

 

5.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Canada

 

 

–5.3

 

 

5.7

 

 

4.9

 

 

Remaining Advanced Economies

 

–1.9

4.6

 

3.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developing Economies

 

 

–2.1

 

 

6.4

 

 

5.1

 

 

Emerging and Developing Asia

 

–0.8

7.2

 

6.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

China

 

 

2.3

 

 

8.0

 

 

5.6

 

 

India*

 

 

–7.3

 

 

9.5

 

 

8.5

 

 

ASEAN**

 

 

–3.4

 

 

2.9

 

 

5.8

 

 

Emerging and Developing Europe

 

–2.0

6.0

 

3.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Latin America and the Caribbean

 

 

–7.0

 

 

6.3

 

 

3.0

 

 

Middle East and Central Asia

 

–2.8

4.1

 

4.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sub-Saharan Africa

 

 

–1.7

 

 

3.7

 

 

3.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Notes: E-Estimate

*For India, data and forecasts are presented on a fiscal year basis and GDP from 2011 onward is based on GDP at market prices with fiscal year 2011/12 as a base year.

**Includes Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam Source: IMF – World Economic Outlook, Oct 2021

Advanced economies are projected to grow by 5.2% in CY2021 after a negative growth of 4.5% in CY2020. It is expected to moderate to a growth of 4.5% in CY2022. The growth forecast for the advanced economies has been marked up by IMF from its April 2021 projections on the back of the

Page 8 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

pace of the vaccine rollouts and additional fiscal support. Amongst the advanced economies, United States is projected to grow by 6% in CY21 and moderate to a growth of 5.2% in CY2022. Meanwhile, the projections for Japan has been downgraded due to strict restrictions in first half of CY2021 and is expected to see stronger recovery in the second half of CY2021.

Emerging market and developing economies are estimated to grow by 6.4% in CY2021 after contracting by -2.1% in CY2020. It is projected to grow by 5.1% in CY2022.The projections for emerging market and developing economies were downgraded by IMF from its April 2021 estimates primarily due to markdowns carried out in the emerging Asian economies group. Within this group, India was marked down on account surge in Covid-19 cases during March-May 2021. Similarly, the ASEAN-5 group is also witnessing rise in cases which is in turn impacting the pace of economic recovery. China’s forecast was downgraded too due to scaling back of overall government support. Meanwhile, growth projections for other regions in general in the emerging market and developing economies have been marked up depending on the vaccine rollouts and government policy support which in turn has led to stronger than expected recovery in Q1CY2021.

IMF highlighted in its report that the economic recovery is highly dependent on vaccine access across regions, hence economies will witness diverging recovery rates which may not remain steady as long as people are exposed to the virus and its emerging variants. Close to 40% of the population is vaccinated in the advanced economies while only around 10% of the population is vaccinated in the emerging market and developing economies and only a tiny proportion of population is vaccinated in low-income group. Hence, the economic growth projections are dependent on several factors such as access to vaccine, pace of its rollout, its ability to fight emerging variants of the virus and the fiscal and monetary support provided by the governments.

1.2 Indian Economy1

CARE Ratings Economics Research projects GDP growth to be in the range of 8.8% to 9% for FY22. The growth rate should be viewed with caution as it is followed by a -7.3% decline in FY21.

The economic outlook for the economy for FY22 would seem to look better on almost all counts than FY21 due to negative base effect. The pandemic induced lockdown pushed the growth down to -7.3%

1Source: CARE Ratings Economics Research report titled ‘Economic Outlook for India FY2021-22’ dated 26th July, 2021

Page 9 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

in FY21. It was expected that subsequently growth would be rapid in FY22 with both the negative base effect as well as the pent-up demand for consumption and investment helping to accelerate the growth. However, the advent of the second wave of Covid-19 in the beginning of the current financial year which led to state induced lockdowns has upended this assumption to an extent.

Business, as seen ex post, has been better equipped to face the lockdown and while activity did reduce across the country as well as sectors, the impact was less severe. The reverse migration which took place in large numbers last year was of a lower magnitude this time. SMEs were again under pressure in this phase, but as they were operating at less than normal potential, they were not pushed back that severely. Therefore, while the projections made by CARE Ratings Economics Research have come down significantly from March as can be seen from exhibit 2 below, the drop is less damaging this time.

Exhibit 2: Movement in CARE Ratings Economics Research forecasts for GDP growth (in %)

 

Date of forecast

 

 

GDP growth

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020-21 (Actual)

 

 

-8.0

 

 

2021-22: 24 March'21

11-11.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021-22: 5 April'21

 

 

10.7

 

 

2021-22: 21 April'21

10.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021-22: 12 May’ 21

 

 

9.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: CARE Ratings Economics Research

Some of the major economic indicators are mentioned below.

1.2.1 Gross Domestic Product (GDP)

GDP is the sum of private consumption, gross investment in the economy, government investment, government spending and net foreign trade (difference between exports and imports). In FY19, quarter wise growth in GDP remained in the range of 5% to 8% while in FY20 it declined and was in the range of 3% to 6%. During FY21, it contracted by -24.4% in Q1FY21 to a growth of 1.6% in Q4FY21. However, in Q1 FY22, the jump in GDP numbers of 20.1% is mainly due to a weak base last year and also a rebound in consumer spending during the quarter.

Page 10 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Figure 1: Quarter wise yearly growth in GDP at constant prices (in %)

Source: MOSPI

1.2.2 Gross Value Added (GVA)

Gross value added (GVA) is the measure of the value of goods and services produced in an economy. GVA gives a picture of supply side whereas GDP represents consumption. CARE Ratings Economics Research expects GVA to grow by 7.8% in FY22 after declining by -6.2% in FY21. Agriculture and Industry are expected to lead the economic recovery while a growth rate of 8.2% in services may not suffice as the lockdown imposed during the second wave of Covid-19 severely affected sectors like hotels, restaurants, tourism and retail malls.

Figure 2: GVA Growth in FY22

1413.1

10

87.3

%

 

6.4

in

 

6

5.6

 

 

 

 

4

2

0

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

Figure 3: Sectoral GDP Projections

 

12

 

 

 

 

9.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

 

8.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.6

3.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

%

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-2

 

 

 

Agriculture Industry

 

Services Total GVA

 

 

 

 

 

-4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-6.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-8

 

 

 

 

-7.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-8.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY21 FY22E

Page 11 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Source: CARE Ratings Economics Research

1.2.3 Industrial Growth

During FY21, industrial output as measured by index of industrial production - IIP declined by -8.6% as compared with a negative growth rate of 0.8% in FY20. This implies that industrial production contracted for 2 consecutive years and the fall in FY21 has been the steepest in the series of 2011-12. There has been a sustained decline in industrial production growth from FY17 and that has been exacerbated in FY21 following the nation-wide lockdowns, state-wise restrictions to control the spread of the COVID-19 infections. 8 out of the 12 months in FY21 have registered negative growth with the highest growth of 4.5% observed in October 2020.

Further, in the last month of FY21, the index registered a growth of 24.2% followed by a 134.6% growth in April-21 and 29.3% growth in May-21. For all the 3 consecutive months, the growth rate was backed by the statistical push of low base.

Figure 3: Yearly growth in IIP (in %)

Source: CMIE

1.2.4 Per Capita GDP, Income and Final Consumption

India’s per capita gross domestic product (GDP) de-grew by -8.2% in FY21 from 3.0% growth in FY20. Gross national income (GNI) dropped by 8.2% in FY21 from a 3.1% growth in FY20. The per capita private final consumption expenditure (PFCE), that represents consumer spending, declined by - 10.1% in FY21 after growing by 4.4% in FY20.

Page 12 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Figure 4: Growth in per capita GDP, Income & Final Consumption

3.0

3.1

4.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-8.2

 

 

 

-8.2

-10.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per capita GDP

Per capita GNI

Per capita PFCE

 

 

 

FY20

 

FY21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: CMIE

1.3 Indian Economy outlook

CARE Ratings estimated India’s GDP growth rate at 9.2% for the FY2022. India’s growth outlook has improved significantly and the covid-19 vaccination drive will help the economic rebound. The Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) kept the repo rate unchanged at 4% while maintaining an accommodative stance as long as necessary to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Indian central bank was widely expected to keep key interest steady amid a surge in COVID-19 cases in the country.

The recent surge in COVID-19 cases has caused lockdown and curfew in many states resulting in a dip in consumer confidence and reignited uncertainty regarding the near-term outlook. Second wave of COVID-19 infections and subsequent lockdowns are derailing economic momentum, RBI interventions will help maintain adequate liquidity as well as prevent hardening of yields in bond market. These measures will ensure economic stability.

The Government has declared that vaccine will be given to every adult citizen (above 18 years) which may help to reduce the transmission of COVID-19 in the near future. The world’s largest vaccine maker, Serum Institute of India (SII), has sought Rs.30 billion grant from the Government to ramp up capacity of the Covishield COVID-19 vaccine beyond 100 million doses a month that the institute is expected to reach by the end of May 2021.

In the 2021-22 Union Budget, for FY22 capital expenditure is likely to increase by 34.5% at US$ 76 billion over FY21 to boost the economy.

Page 13 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Increased government expenditure is expected to attract private investments, providing excellent

opportunities with production-linked incentive scheme. Consistently policy support is anticipated to

boost the Indian economy.

Page 14 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

INDIAN CAPITAL MARKET OUTLOOK

(Source-NSE,BSE )

Nifty Movement -

 

Date

 

 

Nifty Closing

 

 

Change (Y-o-Y)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2019

 

 

11,623.90

 

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2020

8,597.75

 

-26.32%

 

 

March 31, 2021

 

 

14,690.70

 

 

70.87%

 

 

September 30, 2021

17,618.15

 

19.93%*

 

*March 2021 to Sep 2021

Primary Market Trends (Public & Rights Issues)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(₹ in Million)

 

Particulars

 

 

2019-20

 

 

 

2020-21

 

 

2021-22*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Items

 

 

No. of

 

 

Amount

 

 

No. of

 

 

Amount

 

 

No. of

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

Issues

 

 

 

 

Issues

 

 

 

 

Issues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I. Public Issues (Debt)

 

34

 

1,49,840

 

18

 

1,05,873

 

10

 

53,895

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(a) Public Issue (Equity)

 

 

60

 

 

2,13,221

 

 

57

 

 

4,60,597

 

 

38

 

 

4,58,999

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(b) FPOs

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(c)Rights Issues

 

 

16

 

 

5,56,420

 

 

21

 

 

6,40,588

 

 

9

 

 

7,924

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

II. Total Equity Issues

 

76

 

7,69,641

 

78

 

11,01,185

 

47

 

4,66,923

 

 

(a+b+c)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 15 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Grand Total (I+II)

110

9,19,481

96

12,07,058

57

5,20,818

(Source - SEBI Bulletin)* Data till August 2021. Notes:

1.Equity public issues also includes issues listed on SME platform.

2.From April, 2020 onwards the data of equity is being prepared based on the listing date.

3.The data of Debt is being prepared based on closing date.

Capital Raised by Listed Companies through QIPs

Year

Total No.

Amount

of issues

Rs in Million

 

2015-16

24

145,880

2016-17

20

84,640

2017-18

53

672,570

2018-19

14

86,780

2019-20

14

5,43,890

2020-21

31

7,87,380

2021-22*

15

1,71,910

(Source - SEBI Bulletin)* Data till August 2021.

Government initiative of introducing Goods & Service Tax and the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and increasing participation of the domestic mutual fund industry as a strong counterbalance to foreign funds has been an important factor for the shift in the country's financial space. The BSE Sensex on 30th September 2021, closing at 59,126 witnessing 63.09% rise from its 1st January, 2019 closing at 36,255. The Nifty 50 index also rose 61.48% at 17,618 on 30th September 2021 compared to closing on 1st January, 2019 at 10,910. Increase in global liquidity, the government's demonstration of its serious intent for economic reforms, signs of a turnaround in corporate earnings has boosted the Capital Market’s attractiveness for the investors during the calendar year 2021. Total amount mobilized through public issues and private placement of both debt and equity was Rs. 520.82 billion with total issue of 57 from April 1st 2021 till August 31st 2021 as compared to Rs. 1207.05 billion with total issue of 96 from April 1st2020 till March 31st 2021 a decrease of 56.85% in the amount mobilized and 40.62% decrease in No. of issues.

Page 16 of 98

(Source – CART).

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

INDIAN WEALTH MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY OVERVIEW

The Indian Wealth Management market is on a sustained path of growth, given India’s long-term economic prospects, positive demographics, rising income levels and current low penetration. While the percentage of wealthy individuals in India is very small compared with developed markets, very high potential of growth in wealth is estimated in future. India has the key ingredients of a high- growth wealth management market, namely driven by a very large and young mass affluent segment; an increase in the wealth of global Indians; the Indian government’s push to control illegal channel of funds and push for tighter regulations of the capital markets.

Number of millionaires in 2020 and 2025 (Selected countries)

 

Country

 

 

Number (thousand)

 

 

Change

 

 

CAGR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2025

 

 

(%)

 

 

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

21,951

28,055

28

 

5.03%

 

China

 

 

5,279

 

 

10,172

 

 

93

 

 

14.02%

 

 

Japan

3,662

5,411

48

 

8.12%

 

United Kingdom

 

 

2,491

 

 

3,711

 

 

49

 

 

8.30%

 

 

Germany

2,953

4,240

44

 

7.50%

 

India

 

 

698

 

 

1,269

 

 

82%

 

 

12.70%

 

 

World

56,084

84,014

49%

 

8.42%

(Source- Global Wealth Report 2021)

The demographic difference presents an opportunity to create new products to address the needs of a young population and leverage new technologies, such as social and software-based investing applications as a key differentiator. Indian wealth management industry is largely focused mainly on the urban segment, leaving untapped majority of Indian population. One of the key factors for Advisors is to develop trust with the potential investors where advisors constantly need to build its brand, focus on overcoming trust barriers, invest in technology and focus on transparency and compliance.

In 2018, top 8% of the total population in India represents 45% of the total wealth and of the above only 20% take advice from wealth managers. With increase in start-ups, rising income levels and friendly macro factors with ease of doing business will drive growth of young HNI population in India; there is a big opportunity for a wealth management firm to tap into an underpenetrated market with huge upside growth potential for wealth managers

There is steady growth in number of client’s interest towards:

1)Access to Mutual Fund / Other financial Product Distribution

2)Financial Planning (specific short term and long term goals) Advice

3)Tax Planning Advice

4)Estate Planning Advice

Page 17 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

5) Wealth Management Advice

Based on the investment corpus available with the individuals, CART have grouped individuals in following four categories -

Retail – With financial assets of Rs. 1 million and lower

Mass Affluent – With financial assets between Rs 1 million to Rs. 50 million

HNI - With financial assets between Rs 50 million to Rs. 500 million

Ultra HNI – With financial assets of more than Rs. 500 million

Wealth Pyramid

 

• Rs.500+ million in Financial Assets

Ultra HNI

 

HNI

• Rs.50 - 500 million in Financial Assets

 

Mass Affluent

• Rs.1 - 50 million in Financial Assets

Retail

• Below Rs.1 million in Financial Assets

 

 

Indian Mutual Fund Industry Overview

(Source -AMFI)

The Indian mutual fund industry has a long history of over 50 years, starting with the formation of UTI, a joint initiative of the Government of India (“GOI”) and the RBI in 1963. It was regulated and

Page 18 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

controlled by the RBI until 1978, after which the Industrial Development Bank of India (“IDBI”) took over. UTI launched its first scheme, Unit Scheme 1964, in 1964 and its AUM reached ₹ 67 billion by 1988. The year 1987 witnessed the entry of other public sector banks to set up mutual fund business in the country. Since 2003, the mutual fund industry has witnessed a healthy growth, supported by various regulatory measures as well as investor education initiatives, where AUM of the Indian MF Industry has grown from ₹ 3.26 trillion as on 31st March 2007 to ₹ 36.73 trillion as on 30th September, 2021, more than 11.27 times in a span of about 14.5 years.

Digital presence by mutual fund houses and wealth management players is enhancing distribution reach. Digital advances have ensured distribution efficiencies, and also helped to create predictable revenue streams in the business. Digital platforms have helped distributors to focus more on research and tracking markets rather than operational tasks such as individual client visits and extended paperwork. Tablet and mobile apps are helping mutual funds increase reach in B30 locations. Moreover, there have been several industry-wide initiatives to help distributors build digital capabilities in order to serve investors better. While there are all types of distributors — robots, fee-based advisors and transaction-only distributors — will co-exist as there is low penetration of distributors in the country, with only a small number of distributors catering to the large population base.

Note: As per SEBI circular SEBI/HO/IMD/DF2/CIR/P/2018/16 dated 02.02.2018, the terms and definition of “15 cities”, “T15” and “B15” are substituted with “30 cities”, “T30” and “B30” respectively, with effect from April 1, 2018.

Players in the Indian wealth management space

Products offered: Wealth managers in India mainly sell mutual funds, private equity funds, real estate funds, non-convertible debentures, portfolio management services, structured products and tax-free bonds to investors.

Page 19 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

 

Business model

Market

 

Key characteristics

 

 

positioning

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Universal banks

Strong

Includes large players, mainly private banks;

 

 

 

 

recently some PSU

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banks have also announced plans to launch wealth-

 

 

 

 

management services

 

 

 

 

 

Extensive reach

 

 

 

 

 

 

Relatively high entry barriers

 

 

 

 

 

Cross-sell potential with both retail and corporate

 

 

 

 

customers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wealth management

Medium

Mainly foreign players with strong understanding of

 

Specialists

 

 

advisory services

 

 

 

 

 

 

Offerings are mainly managed/structured products

 

 

 

Typically high entry barriers

 

 

 

 

 

Focus on the UHNI segment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Global investment banks

Weak

Focus on the UHNI segment

 

 

 

 

 

Institutional approach to serve clients with

 

 

 

 

investment banking products

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brokers/dealer discount/

Strong

Large number of players

 

 

 

online brokers

 

Focus on the mass affluent segment

 

 

 

 

Mainly offer mutual fund products

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

National distributors

Strong

Some firms are affiliated to a brokerage firm with a

 

 

 

 

large network of sub-brokers

 

 

 

 

 

Large firms with extensive distribution network

 

 

 

Multiple products

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Family office

Weak

Holistic advisory services for specific client

 

 

 

 

segments such as entrepreneurs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robo-advisors

Upcoming

Fully automated or hybrid investment managers

 

 

 

Algorithm-based

advice

without

human

 

 

 

 

intervention

 

 

 

 

 

 

Suitable for small-ticket retail investors

 

 

 

 

Available at a lower cost

 

 

 

 

 

Consistent and transparent advice

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Others (independent

Medium

Very low entry barriers

 

 

 

funds/insurance advisors,

 

Commission-driven model

 

 

 

Etc.)

 

No dedicated wealth management offering

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 20 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

KEY GROWTH DRIVERS

1.Increasing Penetration of Mutual Fund Market in India

Assets managed by the Indian mutual fund industry has increased from Rs. 27.74 trillion in September 2020 to Rs. 37.41 trillion in September 2021. That represents 34.84% increase in assets over September 2020. (Assets are measured as average assets for the month).

Despite the size and growth profile, India continues to be underpenetrated with a mutual fund penetration rate (the ratio of period ending mutual fund AUM to GDP) of 16.0% in 2020, as compared to 140% in the United States, 84% in Brazil and a global average of 63%. Further, India accounts for less than 2% of the global mutual fund industry, representing a significant growth opportunity.

Mutual Fund Penetration of various Countries CY2020 – AUM to GDP

(Source: CART, Statista.com)

There is lack of healthy participation from investors in B30 (beyond top 30) locations. Recently, the mutual fund sector is witnessing rising activity from B30 locations, especially in the equity segment due to improved distribution and regulatory changes in fee structure. Lack of awareness about financial instruments and prevalence of low financial knowledge has been one of the key factors in a lower inflow of investments as compared to that in other BRIC nations like China and Brazil. Favorable demographics and rising income levels make it one of the most attractive sectors in the financial services industry. Robust macroeconomic fundamentals outlook and various government reforms have strengthened investor confidence, prompting them to participate in the equity market, especially increased participation of investors from tier 3 and tier 4 cities. With increasing mobile phone penetration and increasing wealth managers’ use of technology enables transparency and systematic products in an efficient manner which in turn helps to develop informed customers and

Page 21 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

distributors to penetrate deeper across the wealth management space.

a. Distributors - Key to drive growth of MF Industry

September - 2019

(Source-AMFI)

About 13% of the retail investors chose to invest directly, while 22% of HNI assets were invested directly.

(Source-AMFI)

Page 22 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

March - 2021

(Source-AMFI)

About 16% of the retail investors chose to invest directly, while 24% of HNI assets were invested directly. 47% of the assets of the mutual fund industry came directly. A large proportion of direct investments were in non-equity-oriented schemes where institutional investors dominate.

(Source-AMFI)

76% of liquid/money market scheme assets where institutional investors dominate, were direct, whereas 57% of debt-oriented scheme assets and 21% of equity scheme assets were direct.

Page 23 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

August - 2021

(Source-AMFI)

About 17% of the retail investors chose to invest directly, while 24% of HNI assets were invested directly. 46% of the assets of the mutual fund industry came directly. A large proportion of direct investments were in non-equity-oriented schemes where institutional investors dominate.

(Source-AMFI)

76% of liquid/money market scheme assets where institutional investors dominate, were direct, whereas 59% of debt-oriented scheme assets and 22% of equity scheme assets were direct.

Distributors have been a key player for strong participation from retail investors that has led to overall growth in the industry. Commission rates for the distributors have relatively remained stable and the increase in participations of investors through distributors has been a key driver for increase

Page 24 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

in total AUM of mutual fund industry. Retailers /HNIs have preferred to invest through distributors. As of August 2021, about 83% of the retail investors chose to invest through distributor, while 76% of HNI assets were invested through distributor. In the equity schemes, 78% of the assets were through distributors who have been an important factor for growth of domestic equity market. Distributors are becoming more and more prominent with private players dominating the distribution market where advisors still play a critical role in providing information to potential investors. Distributors from B30 cities are also key drivers for increasing penetration of mutual funds in the smaller cities and attractive incentives in low per capita state.

Investors – Overall Composition

(Source-AMFI)

Distribution channel accounted for 79% of total mutual fund assets under management (AUM) as on August 2021, of which 58% belongs to top 30 cities.

Page 25 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

State-wise new ARN registration as on March 2021

 

State / Union territory

 

 

% of ARN/ EUIN

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maharashtra

 

 

25.29%

 

 

Gujarat

 

12.26%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Uttar Pradesh

 

 

8.35%

 

 

Tamil Nadu

 

5.99%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

West Bengal

 

 

5.52%

 

 

Delhi

 

5.48%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Karnataka

 

 

5.22%

 

 

Rajasthan

 

3.81%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Madhya Pradesh

 

 

3.66%

 

 

Telangana

 

3.63%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Haryana

 

 

3.27%

 

 

Odisha

 

2.62%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Andhra Pradesh

 

 

2.36%

 

 

Jharkhand

 

2.14%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kerala

 

 

2.14%

 

 

Bihar

 

1.92%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Punjab

 

 

1.81%

 

 

Remaining states

 

4.53%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

100.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-AMFI)

Maharashtra continues to be the top state to add the highest number of new MFDs/EUIN in the industry. Maharashtra accounts for 25% of the new ARN and EUIN registrations, shows the latest AMFI data on geographical spread of the new ARN holders as on March 2021.

Meanwhile, Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh have secured second and third position in terms of bringing in new distributors in the industry. Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh have contributed 12% and 8% new distributors, respectively. The top three states collectively contribute over 45% of the new ARN and EUIN registrations.

AMFI data shows that 46% of the individual distributors has come from B30 cities as of March 2021. Of the 94,510 registered individual distributors, 43,823 has come from B30 cities while the remaining 50,687 or 54% distributors were from T30 cities.

B30 cities have added 3,405 new individual MFDs while T30 cities saw an addition of 3,475 new MFDs under individual category in the last one year.

Overall, the mutual fund industry has over 0.243 million ARNs of which over 0.094 million are

Page 26 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

individual distributors, 0.133 million are employees & 0.016 falls Under Other Category.

b. Increase in Retail participation and mass affluent

(Source-AMFI)

c. B30 and T30 Asset Mix

(Source-AMFI)

Note: As per SEBI circular SEBI/HO/IMD/DF2/CIR/P/2018/16 dated 02.02.2018, the terms and definition of “15 cities”, “T15” and “B15” are substituted with “30 cities”, “T30” and “B30” respectively, with effect from April 1, 2018.

Page 27 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

The wealth management market (assets under advisory) in India is about ₹ 21.77 trillion in July 2021, which is only approx. 9% of the country's GDP, as compared to 60% to 75% of GDP in established markets. The increase in penetration of wealth management companies into Tier II and III cities will also help to drive the growth given more than 44% of the UHNIs live in non-Metro where currently wealth is majorly managed by IFAs and Chartered Accountants. (Source-AMFI).

The investable wealth across HNI and mass affluent segment is rising due to fast growing economy, creating a need for wealth services across various potential investors group. More than 50% of the Indian population is under 25 years of age and this is the largest and fastest-growing adult segment across the globe which represents a greatest opportunity for the wealth management industry. Favourable demographics, rising income levels and a burgeoning affluent middle class will provide a strong customer base for wealth management sector.

As investors are getting more educated, retail investor’s style of investing is becoming more mature and they are becoming aware of the potential that equities offer along with the associated risks. Individual investor’s component of total number of folios in the industry has steadily increasing over the years where mass affluent retail investors are spearheading the growth rate. Mutual funds remain a largely under represented asset class in India where a large part of mutual fund savings originate from the large cities. Growing popularity of mutual funds has seen increasing participation from retail investors in B30 cities.

The top five cities, Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, Kolkata and Pune contributed to 57.31% of the AUM of mutual fund for the quarter ending in June 2021. But with rising income levels and a growing affluent middle class, Retail investors are becoming more inclined towards equities as an investment option over traditional preference of savings towards physical assets, especially from B30 cities. As of March 2021, Mumbai and New Delhi attributed to 43% of the average AUM compared to 56% in March 2015. 16% of the assets of the mutual fund industry came from B30 locations in July 2021. Assets from B30 increased from Rs.4.45 trillion in August 2020 to 5.86 trillion in August 2021, representing an increase of 32%.

Investors from B30 locations are attracted towards equity as compared to T30 (T30 refers to the top 30 geographical locations in India and B30 refers to the locations beyond the top 30) where debt portion is higher due to large participation from institutional investors. As of August 2021, 71% of the assets from B30 locations are in equity schemes as compared to 62% from B30 locations in March 2018.

Investors in urban cities get advice from several large bank and wealth managers, but mass affluent retail clients depends on IFAs for advice on mutual fund where there is immense potential to tap the untapped market. Small investors are opting for mutual funds through systematic investment plans (SIPs) in order to create long term wealth and meet their financial goals.

Page 28 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

d. Increase in folios

(Source-AMFI)

Retail investor’s preference is becoming more mature as they get more informed regarding equities potential and risk associated in investing in it. Since March 2014, there is an increase in investor accounts from 39.5 million to 102.6 million in June 2021. Increase in penetration of mutual funds products driven by increase in number of folios and participation from mass affluent segment. Total number of accounts (or folios as per mutual fund parlance) as on June 30, 2021 stood at 102.6 million, while the number of folios under Equity, ELSS and Balanced schemes, wherein the maximum investment is from retail segment stood at 92.8 million. Individual investor’s component of total number of folios in the industry has been steadily increasing over period of years where mass affluent retail investors are spearheading the growth rate. The total number of retail investor folios increased from 45.40 million as of March 31, 2016 to 92.8 million as of June 30, 2021, adding 47.45 million folios in 5.25 years growing at CAGR of 14.60%.

2. Increase in Wealth and HNI population in India

For the past decade, India has been classified as a lower-middle income country which aspires to move a step up in the global prosperity ladder. In the past three decades, per capita incomes have multiplied, poverty has reduced, illiteracy rates have fallen, and health conditions have improved. An expanding economy has provided the much-needed resources to address chronic infrastructure deficits and improve the lives of millions. India is now poised to transition to a higher and more widely shared level of prosperity. Households in the global middle class can fulfil a range of aspirations, such as affordable housing, health care, education, clean water, sanitation facilities, reliable electricity, a safe environment, and discretionary income to spend on leisure pursuits. According to World Bank draft report, unlike East Asia, there is an expanding share of young adults in India, so there is limited risk of sustained wage increases for low-skilled workers and unlike Latin America, India is a net importer of minerals, timber, and many other commodities, so that India’s growth does not fade with declining commodity prices. The share of population in extreme poverty

Page 29 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

of India was reduced from 45% in 1994 to 13.4% in 2015. If this trend continues, India is on track to eliminate extreme poverty by 2026 (to below 3%). The rapid decline in poverty between 2005 and 2015 was driven mainly by higher labour earnings (Source - Policy Research Working Paper by World Bank Group). Non-farm jobs, supported by an unprecedented rise in wages for unskilled labor, helped millions of Indian households to move up the poverty line.

a. Increase in GDP to drive growth of Wealth in India Strong correlation between Wealth/GDP

(Source-Global wealth Report 2019)

The average per capita GDP of India rose from US$ 443 in CY 2000 to US$ 2,104 in CY 2019. In the past three decades, per capita incomes have quadrupled, poverty has retreated, illiteracy rates have declined, and health conditions have improved. An expanding economy has provided the much- needed resources to address chronic infrastructure deficits and improve the lives of millions. Increase in GDP/Adult ratio of selected developed nations such as United States, Japan, Australia; has also led to increase in their wealth/GDP ratio. While India’s GDP is expected to grow at much faster rate, it is estimated that it will mirror similar increase in its wealth/GDP ratio as growth observed by developing nations. Wealth per adult grew by 1.2%, raising global mean wealth to a record high of $70,850 per adult in CY2019. Most of the top performing countries were boosted by strong stock market gains during the year. In developed regions such as North America and Europe, financial savings represents a high proportion of overall wealth per adult as compared to other regions. Strong underlying economic expansion along with significant growth per capita income will drive the pace of

Page 30 of 98

(Source-Kotak Wealth-Top of the Pyramid Report)

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

wealth creation in India where investment towards financial savings is gradually increasing with increase in GDP.

b. Increase in HNI population and reliance on wealth managers for investment advice Growth of Ultra HNIs in India

(Source-Kotak Wealth-Top of the Pyramid Report)

India currently has one of the youngest populations in the world, with a median age of 27.73 years and has the world’s highest number of 10 to 24-year-olds, with 242 million, compared to China, which has 185 million young people. By 2021, India is expected to have 34.33% share of youth in total population. Although India is one of the world’s fastest growing UHNI’s populations both in terms of the number of individuals and the wealth levels, percentage of wealthy Indians remains very small compared with developed economies. With increase in start-ups, rising income levels and friendly macro factors with ease of doing business will drive growth of young HNI population in India, a big opportunity for wealth management firm to tap into underpenetrated market. In 2017 around 69% of total HNI population in India is below the age of 55 years where majority of them seeks a wealth manager to advice on investment opportunity as they neither have the expertise nor the time to monitor their investments. The number of UHNIs grew to 1,60,600 (with Rs.153 trillion worth of assets) at the end of 2017, up 10% from that in 2016 , which roughly equalled the combined market- capitalization of all companies listed on BSE. Ultra-HNIs in India are expected to double to 3,30,400 with Rs.352 trillion worth of assets by 2022 at a CAGR of 18.13% mostly increase driven by young Indians getting wealthier. UHNHs in India are inclining towards ‘opportunity-driven approach’ to equity investing and are keen on reducing exposure to real estate and debt instruments in pursuit of bigger profits in equity market.

Page 31 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

3.Increase in Household savings with high proportion of savings towards financial assets.

a. Increase in preference of investing in financial assets

Changes in Household savings in India

(Source-www.rbi.org.in)

Sector-Wise Domestic Saving at Current Prices

 

 

 

 

(in Billion)

 

 

Particulars

2014-15

2015-16

2016-17

2017-18

 

2018-19

2019-20

Gross financial saving

12,572

14,962

16,147

20,564

 

21,341

22,846

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Less-financial liabilities

3,768

3,854

4,686

7,507

 

7,784

6,641

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Financial Savings

8,804

11,108

11,460

13,057

 

13,557

16,205

Saving in physical assets

15,131

13,176

15,946

19,442

 

22,481

23,272

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Saving in the form of valuables

456

465

465

467

 

427

431

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Household sector

24,391

24,749

27,871

32,966

 

36,465

39,908

GVA

97,121

1,04,919

1,13,283

1,20,342

 

1,27,442

1,32,715

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Financial Savings as % of GVA

9.07%

10.59%

10.12%

10.85%

 

10.64%

12.21%

(Source-www.rbi.org.in)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As can been seen from the above graph, share of Financial Savings increased to 41% in 2019-20 from 2014-15. The Financial Savings is at Rs. 16,205 billion 2019-20.

Changes in Financial Assets / Liabilities of the Household Sector

Page 32 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

(In Billion)

 

Sr.no

 

 

Particulars

 

 

2014-15

 

 

2015-16

 

 

2016-17

 

 

2017-18

 

 

2018-19

 

 

2019-20

 

1

 

 

Currency

1,333

 

2,005

 

(3,329)

 

4,847

 

2,779

 

2,826

 

2

 

 

Bank deposits

5,793

 

6,224

 

9,386

 

5,216

 

7,800

 

8,374

 

3

 

 

Non- banking deposits

289

 

181

 

349

 

-6

 

301

 

281

 

4

 

 

Life insurance fund

2,993

 

2,642

 

3,543

 

3,440

 

3,588

 

3,178

 

5

 

 

Provident and pension fund

1,909

 

2,907

 

3,255

 

3,694

 

3,977

 

4,655

 

6

 

 

Claims on Govern- ment

10

 

679

 

1,155

 

1,557

 

2,064

 

2,715

 

7

 

 

Shares & debent- ures

204

 

284

 

1,745

 

1,774

 

790

 

774

 

8

 

 

Units of UTI

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

9

 

 

Trade Debt (Net)

42

 

41

 

44

 

42

 

42

 

43

 

 

10

 

 

Changes in financial assets (2 to 9)

 

 

12,572

 

 

14,962

 

 

16,147

 

 

20,564

 

 

21,341

 

 

22,846

 

11

 

 

Bank advances

2,824

 

2,694

 

3,458

 

5,255

 

6,090

 

5511.57

 

12

 

 

Loans & advances from other

942

 

1,156

 

1,229

 

2,250

 

1,688

 

1128.32

 

 

 

financial institutions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13

 

 

Loans & advances from

2

 

4

 

(0)

 

2

 

6

 

1.19

 

 

 

Government

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

 

 

Loans & advances from co-

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

operative non-credit societies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

Changes in financial liabilities (11

 

 

3,768

 

 

3,854

 

 

4,686

 

 

7,507

 

 

7,784

 

 

6,641

 

 

 

 

to 14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Financial Savings (10-15)

8,804

 

11,108

 

11,460

 

13,057

 

13,557

 

16,205

 

(Source-www.rbi.org.in)

(Source-www.rbi.org.in)

As can be seen from the above table, across the key asset classes, there has been an increase in proportion, primarily in financial asset class and the trend is likely to continue to grow in the coming years.

Page 33 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Figure: Breakup of changes in financial assets / liabilities of the household sector

(Source-www.rbi.org.in)

4. Digitalizing Wealth Management Sector

Technology is poised to change the nature and delivery of financial advice in some significant ways. Technology is enabling platform convergence and creating opportunities for new client engagement. There is an increasing number of online trading, brokerage, investment, direct-to- consumer (D2C) and robo-advisors offering user friendly, low-cost, automated solutions for core functions such as investing, asset allocation, and portfolio management and reporting. Asset managers revamp their business models — standardize, centralize and outsource through the use of technology. Processes are becoming paperless, efficient, easy and real-time.

Trends driving the emergence of robo advisors

Focus on mass market

Wealth managers have traditionally focused on the HNI and ultra-HNI segments, which align better with the economics of their advisor-based business model, providing sophisticated products and face-to-face service. This leaves less affluent investors devoid of high-quality wealth management advice.

Robo-advisers have the ability to make wealth advice economically feasible to the mass market. Their operating model differs from that of traditional players in that it is less sophisticated in terms of products but clear and efficient in scalability. This, in turn, has enabled these players to reach client segments that have traditionally been out of reach of wealth managers.

The mass market offers tremendous potential for wealth managers worldwide. Although these clients may be relatively small on an individual level, when aggregated they represent a significant

Page 34 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

asset base (for instance, in the US, the mass affluent segment offers a market potential of ~US$ 10t). These digital firms have made it possible to bring investment advice to the masses and unlock the large potential of underserved segments through their low-cost and potentially highly scalable solutions in order to meet core wealth management needs.

Demographic shift

The wealth management industry is witnessing a phase of significant demographic change as its largest investor segment — the baby boomers (born between 1946 and 1965) — retires and assets are transferred to the next generation — Gen-X (born between 1966 and 1980) and Gen- Y/millennial (born after 1980).

Younger set of investors have largely been underserved by traditional players, with only 18% of financial advisors in the US targeting Gen-Y clients

Traditional wealth managers are facing challenges in maintaining relationship with clients, who are tech-savvy and believe in a do-it-yourself approach. On average, a financial advisor is over 50 years of age, which results in a generational gap and a slight disconnect with the younger generation.

The simple technology platforms offered by new-age digital wealth managers resonate well with the needs of millennials. Digital entrants have also benefited from the fact that many millennials do not have a trusted advisor relationship and feel comfortable using technology to manage their finances. Hence, digital firms are well positioned to capitalize on the generational shift.

Advanced digital capabilities

Digital has changed the way people interact, creating opportunities for new engagement models with end investors.

These technology-backed automated investment services (robo-advisors) have been developed on the premise that many of the activities performed by traditional investment advisors can be replicated by adopting advanced digital capabilities.

Robo-advisors have successfully leveraged the demand for user friendly and interconnected digital services and deployed a simple streamlined digital experience for clients.

These firms have created direct-to-consumer models to provide the basic elements of wealth management advice, minimizing the traditional reliance on human advisors. Digital platforms automatically invest and rebalance according to clients’ goals and risk tolerances sans human interference.

5.Government Initiatives

Page 35 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

In order to promote investors participation, government / regulators are boosting investor’s confidences to participate in equity / debt market by increased focus on client centricity, fiduciary responsibility and compliance. Regulator have been more stringent in their requirements regarding advisor qualifications, infrastructure, risk profiling and suitability criteria. To enhance the penetration of mutual funds in the country, SEBI sought to increase the sales in the B15 location through the commission structure. In 2011, SEBI proposed a self-regulatory organization (SRO) for the Indian wealth management sector that would help regulate business and serve as a medium for SEBI to implement various wealth management initiatives. In September 2012, SEBI allowed fund houses to charge an additional 30 basis points on daily net assets in the total expense ratio, should the new inflows from B15 cities be at least 30% of the gross new inflows in the scheme or 15% of the average AUM, whichever is higher. As per SEBI circular SEBI/HO/IMD/DF2/CIR/P/2018/16 dated 02.02.2018, the terms and definition of “15 cities”, “T15” and “B15” are substituted with “30 cities”, “T30” and “B30” respectively, with effect from April 1, 2018. Later in April 2019, SEBI issued a consultation paper on SROs for intermediaries including investment advisors. In August 2020, SEBI notification called for a wholly- owned subsidiary of a stock exchange to administer and supervise such advisers.

COVID – 19 impact on Wealth Management firms

As the COVID -19 sunsets, firms are likely to take measures to improve and rebuild customer confidence in their investment portfolios. In FY21, with the onset of covid there was apprehension amongst investors especially in the equity category of mutual funds. Given below is a brief table on how the net sales for the certain classes of Mutual funds.

 

Category

 

 

Net Inflow (+ve)/ Outflow (-ve) for the period in Rs. Billion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Q2FY22

 

 

Q1FY22

 

 

Q4FY21

 

 

Q3FY21

 

 

Q2FY21

 

 

Q1FY21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Multi Cap Fund $$

37.16

 

20.06

 

67.44

 

-82.86

 

-33.34

 

12.21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Large Cap Fund

 

 

5.28

 

 

18.10

 

 

-34.10

 

 

-77.16

 

 

-24.95

 

 

30.34

 

 

Large & Mid Cap Fund

19.43

 

23.53

 

9.14

 

-16.47

 

-0.12

 

11.38

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mid Cap Fund

 

 

30.01

 

 

40.55

 

 

1.97

 

 

-35.08

 

 

-12.50

 

 

8.14

 

 

Small Cap Fund

13.67

 

19.70

 

-16.88

 

-22.12

 

-0.62

 

9.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dividend Yield Fund

 

 

0.40

 

 

6.97

 

 

0.19

 

 

13.62

 

 

-0.82

 

 

-0.29

 

 

Value Fund/Contra Fund

-11.93

 

-6.98

 

-32.17

 

-41.65

 

-18.17

 

0.98

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Focused Fund

 

 

41.97

 

 

20.06

 

 

6.99

 

 

-19.02

 

 

13.63

 

 

17.30

 

 

Sectoral/Thematic Funds

102.32

 

40.49

 

42.30

 

46.39

 

2.05

 

7.27

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ELSS (Open ended)

 

 

-21.62

 

 

-12.18

 

 

-1.16

 

 

-23.53

 

 

2.69

 

 

20.51

 

 

Flexi Cap Fund

182.58

 

24.78

 

-90.45

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ELSS (close ended)

 

 

45.63

 

 

-3.17

 

 

-3.44

 

 

-1.36

 

 

-0.60

 

 

-0.27

 

 

Other Equity Schemes

127.94

 

-35.65

 

-66.90

 

-41.91

 

-16.09

 

-3.04

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

572.85

 

156.27

 

-117.07

 

-301.16

 

-88.83

 

113.79

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: AMFI, Year FY21

Page 36 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

It could raise the need to use data and analytics to fine-tune their customer, product and pricing strategy to meet customer expectations.

Since the COVID-19 period has forced branch lockdowns leaving investors no option but to use online and digital services, the firms could see possible drive and upsurge in demand for digital channels and therefore the need to upscale and upgrade them.

COVID-19 could possibly trigger regulation changes on fees, commissions, advice, risk assessment, margin exposures, investment strategies, portfolio valuations etc.

If the COVID -19 period stretches longer it could create workforce reduction. There could also be probable salary restructuring from commission based to increased fixed salary component or full time employment along with changes in benefits.

There could be push in the industry for retirement planning with investment protection, digital estate planning.

The market could witness large scale sale of portfolio for tax harvesting and large number of portfolio gifting to take advantage tax exemptions due to low portfolio value.

Page 37 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

EVOLUTION OF DIGITAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT

The global wealth management industry is being revolutionized by the rapid pace of digital innovation. After the global financial crisis, while traditional asset managers focused on meeting the enhanced regulatory requirements and resolving other crisis-driven complexities, several new age digital players focused on developing simpler and cheaper methods of delivering financial advice in an innovative way. This paved the way for virtual advice, and amidst the increasing evolution of virtual advice, one of the most recent disruptions is the robo-advisor movement, i.e., the emergence of a new group of digital wealth management firms offering automated investment advice services. Notably, these firms are challenging one of the main paradigms of the wealth management industry: the need for face-to-face interaction and a personalized human touch to financial advice.

Robo advisors are automated, low-cost money management providers that mirror the role of a traditional financial advisor. They offer user-friendly digital platforms and conduct individualized risk

profiling via algorithms to determine an optimal asset allocation for investor’s portfolio vis-à-vis the

archetypal time-intensive face-to-face consultations carried out by traditional wealth managers. The basis for this technology is that algorithms can provide sound and logical financial advice at a fraction of a cost compared to human advisors.

How robo-advisors work

Robo-advisors use a combination of simplified client experience, lower fees and increased transparency to offer automated advice direct to consumers. These digital entrants have changed the fundamental economics and scalability of servicing the underserved segments by combining the basic components of a wealth management offering with seamlessly integrated technology, lower pricing, greater transparency and client-relevant digital content. The process followed by most robo- advisors is as follows:

Step 1: Investors are required to complete a comprehensive online questionnaire designed by behavioral finance experts. This comprises questions related to the investors’ specific needs, financial goals and risk appetite.

Step 2: The robo-advisor platform uses proprietary algorithms to process the inputs, and select a portfolio (mainly focusing on exchange-traded funds [ETFs]) to provide a tailored investment plan to investors. The portfolio is periodically rebalanced to optimize profits and taxes.

Step 3: The portfolios are monitored consistently by computers. Investors can re-adjust their goals and risk tolerance, which will trigger re-balancing of the portfolio.

Robo-advisors mainly provide automated portfolio management, with limited focus on tax, retirement and estate planning, and can charge lower fees because of automation. They offer passive investment and charge lower fees. Technology has revolutionized the wealth management space, leading to the emergence of two alternatives to the traditional wealth management model: fully

Page 38 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

automated digital wealth managers and hybrids, which pair computerized services with a human touch (advisor-assisted digital wealth managers).

Traditional vs. digital wealth managers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Traditional wealth managers

 

 

S

 

Advisor-assisted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

e

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

r

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

v

Full automated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

i

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

c

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

e

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

s

Financial planning

Investment

Insurance

Banking/

Retirement

 

Estates/

 

 

management

 

lending

 

services

 

 

trusts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robo-advisors

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fully automated digital

Advisor-assisted digital

Traditional wealth

 

 

 

wealth managers

 

wealth managers

management firms

 

 

 

Software-based delivery of

Phone-based

financial

Face-to-face

 

 

advice

 

 

 

customized

 

 

and

advisor

 

accessible

mainly

through

the

Business model

automated

investment

through digital channels

branch

network

for

 

 

 

advice

 

 

 

 

for personal advice

 

comprehensive wealth

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

management

 

 

 

 

 

Millennial, tech-savvy and

Mass market and mass

Affluent, HNI and ultra-

 

 

 

price sensitive

customers

affluent

clients

who

NHI

clients

who

value

Client type

 

who

want

to

 

match

value

human

guidance

guidance from a trusted

 

 

 

market

returns

and pay

and technology

 

financial advisor

 

 

 

 

 

low fees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A convenient, easy-to-use

A

 

digital

platform

A dedicated FA with full

 

 

 

and

low-cost

 

online

combined with advisor

range

of

investment

Value proposition

platform offered

 

directly

relationship;

affordable

choices

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

to consumers

 

 

 

pricing for a fully

 

comprehensive

wealth

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

diversified portfolio

planning

 

 

 

Fee structure

 

A 0.25%–0.50% fee on

A 0.30%–0.90% fee on

A 0.75%–1.5%+ fee on

 

 

 

assets

 

managed;

assets

 

managed;

assets

managed;

varies

 

 

 

minimums may apply

monthly fees per

 

by

investment

 

type;

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

planning

 

program;

minimums may apply

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

minimums may apply

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment

 

Risk profile, target asset

Virtual

FA

meetings,

In-person meetings with

process

 

allocation, managed

financial

planning,

risk

a

dedicated

advisor,

Page 39 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

 

 

 

investment

account,

 

profile,

target

asset

financial

planning,

 

 

 

automated

rebalancing

 

allocation, managed

investment proposal,

 

 

 

and easy access

 

investment account,

target

asset

allocation,

 

 

 

 

 

 

automated rebalancing,

brokerage and managed

 

 

 

 

 

 

easy

access

and

accounts,

automated

 

 

 

 

 

 

periodic reviews

 

rebalancing,

in

person

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

access and reviews

 

 

Investment

ETFs and direct indexing

 

ETFs and stocks

 

Stocks,

bonds,

ETFs,

 

 

vehicles

 

 

 

 

 

 

mutual

funds,

options,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

alternative investments,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

commodities and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

structured products

Retail – With financial assets of Rs. 1 million and lower

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mass Affluent – With financial assets between Rs 1 million to Rs. 50 million

 

 

 

 

 

HNI - With financial assets between Rs 50 million to Rs. 500 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ultra HNI – With financial assets of more than Rs. 500 million

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Developments in the robo-advisor space in India

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As the prevalence of rob-advisors has increased globally, these platforms have also made their way to India. Typically, robo-advisors across the globe channelize client’s funds into low-cost index funds and ETFs. Robo advisors in India offer a variety of mutual funds products. The Indian wealth management landscape has not witnessed a proliferation of robo-advisors as there is a lack of a wide range of index funds and ETFs.

Robo-advisers in India are mainly of three kinds:

Basic

Ready portfolio of pre-selected funds

Limited risk profiling and customization

 

 

Customized mutual fund portfolio construction; goal-based financial advice

Advanced

Comprehensive financial counselling (telephonic)

 

Extensive risk profiling and customization

 

Customized mutual fund portfolio construction

Evolved

Goal-based financial advice; basic life and health insurance related advice

Tax optimization; expense restructuring

 

 

Extensive risk profiling and customization

Robo-advisors operate on a very low-cost model compared to traditional wealth management firms. In India, most professional financial planners charge Rs.15,000 to Rs.40,000 a year to manage a client’s portfolio, while wealth management firms, which mainly cater to wealthy clients, charge 0.75% to 1.5% of AUM per year. Robo-advisors are mostly free of cost and earn either from trail commissions from fund houses or charge a very low advisory fee. The typical fee structure of robo- advisors is either of the following:

Page 40 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Charge levied on investors: They generally charge between Rs.1,000 and Rs.7,500 per annum, or

~0.15% of AUM

Compensated by fund: They only work on commissions they get from fund houses, with no charge from investors

Wealth Management Operating Models in the future

Wealth Management Operating Models in the future

Pure Automated Advisory Model

Hybrid Advice Model

Holistic Goal-Based Financial

Planning and Wealth Management

Model

Pure Automated Advisory Model-Suitable for HNIs with basic investment needs with no need for a personal touch, and primarily relies on technology for investment guidance as well as act as a touch point.

Hybrid Advice Model-This model lies in between the above two models and takes advantage of both technology-driven and traditional advice, where the wealth manager takes the calls on whether to steer clients to the digital or personal relationship services.

Holistic Goal-Based Financial Planning and Wealth Management Model-Characterized by a personal relationship between the client and wealth manager and frequent human interaction, this model provides holistic and customized advice.

Page 41 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

KEY INDUSTRY PLAYER OVERVIEW

India AUM League Table 2020- Non Bank Category

 

Rank

 

 

Private wealth manager

 

 

Type

 

 

AUM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(USD bn)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

IIFL Wealth & Asset Management

 

Non-Bank

27.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

Edelweiss Wealth Management

 

 

Non-Bank

 

 

19.9

 

3

 

Julius Baer

 

Non-Bank

17.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

ASK Asset & Wealth Management

 

 

Non-Bank

 

 

9.2

 

5

 

JM Financial Wealth Management

 

Non-Bank

7.8

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

Client Associates

 

 

Non-Bank

 

 

4.5

 

7

 

Karvy Private Wealth

 

Non-Bank

4.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

 

 

Ambit Global Private

 

 

Non-Bank

 

 

4.2

 

9

 

Waterfield Advisors

 

Non-Bank

3.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10

 

 

Centrum Wealth Management

 

 

Non-Bank

 

 

3.5

 

11

 

Anand Rathi Wealth Limited

 

Non-Bank

3.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

 

Avendus Wealth Management

 

 

Non-Bank

 

 

3.3

 

 

(Source-Asian private banker 2020 Report, Company website & Presentation)

India AUM League Table 2020 - Bank Category

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rank

 

 

Private wealth manager

 

 

Type

 

 

AUM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(USD bn)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

Kotak Wealth Management

 

Bank

51.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

ICICI Bank Private Banking

 

 

Bank

 

 

47.1

 

3

 

Axis Bank Burgundy

 

Bank

26.6

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

Standard Chartered Private Bank

 

 

Foreign Bank

 

 

12.7

 

5

 

HDFC Private Bank

 

Bank

12

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

Barclays Private Clients, India

 

 

Foreign Bank

 

 

12

 

7

 

Credit Suisse Private Banking

 

Foreign Bank

5.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-Asian private banker 2020 Report, Company website & Presentation)

Page 42 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

India 2020 RM Headcount League Table- Non Bank Category

Rank

Type

RM headcount

IIFL Wealth & Asset Management

Non-Bank

269

Karvy Private Wealth

Non-Bank

259

 

 

 

Anand Rathi Wealth Limited

Non-Bank

240

Edelweiss Wealth Management

Non-Bank

125

 

 

 

Centrum Wealth Management

Non-Bank

132

Motilal Oswal Private Wealth Management

Non-Bank

124

 

 

 

Validus Wealth

Non-Bank

81

ASK Asset & Wealth Management

Non-Bank

68

 

 

 

JM Financial Wealth Management

Non-Bank

65

Julius Baer

Non-Bank

49

 

 

 

Client Associates

Non-Bank

47

Sanctum Wealth Management

Non-Bank

40

 

 

 

Avendus Wealth Management

Non-Bank

40

 

 

 

(Source-Asian private banker 2020 Report)

India 2020 RM Headcount League Table - Bank Category

Rank

 

Type

RM headcount

ICICI Bank Private Banking

 

Bank

1740

Axis Bank Burgundy

 

Bank

573

 

 

 

 

HDFC Private Bank

 

Bank

309

Kotak Wealth Management

 

Bank

114

 

 

 

 

IDFC FIRST Bank Wealth Management

 

Bank

94

Credit Suisse Private Banking

 

Foreign Bank

33

 

 

 

 

(Source-Asian private banker 2020 Report)

 

 

As can be seen from the above tables, there are various players in Banking and Non-Banking space that are growing rapidly like Kotak Wealth Management, IIFL, Edelweiss in terms of AUM and Anand Rathi, ASK Wealth in terms of number of wealth advisors.

Page 43 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Summary of profitability for wealth management players

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(₹ in Million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

 

Type of Financials

 

 

Financial

 

 

Revenue

 

 

PAT

 

 

EBITDA

 

 

PAT

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Margin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY21

 

 

9,150

 

 

3,690

 

 

3,480

 

 

40%

 

 

IIFL Wealth & Asset

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

FY20

9,200

 

2,060

 

3,560

 

22%

 

 

Management

 

 

 

 

FY19

 

 

10,592

 

 

3,741

 

 

9,658

 

 

35%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY18

10,749

 

3,853

 

5,109

 

36%

 

 

Anand Rathi Wealth

 

 

 

 

FY21

 

 

2,792

 

 

453

 

 

838

 

 

16%

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

FY20

3,364

 

616

 

1,113

 

18%

 

 

Limited

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY19

 

 

2,842

 

 

584

 

 

1,055

 

 

21%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wealth Management

 

 

FY21

10,430

 

2,450

 

 

NA

 

23%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY20

 

 

8,610

 

 

1,620

 

 

NA

 

 

18%

 

 

Edelweiss Advisory

 

 

division of Advisory

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY19

7,250

 

1,620

 

 

NA

 

22%

 

 

 

 

 

Group

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY18

 

 

5,577

 

 

1,087

 

 

NA

 

 

19%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Julius Baer Wealth

 

 

 

 

FY20

1,063

 

-138

 

62

 

 

NM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Standalone

 

FY19

 

 

1,151

 

 

-62

 

 

84

 

 

NM

 

 

Advisors India Pvt. Ltd

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY18

1,243

 

26

 

207

 

2%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sanctum Wealth

 

 

 

 

 

FY20

 

 

203

 

 

-351

 

 

-344

 

 

NM

 

 

 

 

Standalone

 

 

FY19

210

 

-359

 

-342

 

 

NM

 

Management Pvt. Ltd.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY18

 

 

220

 

 

-284

 

 

-273

 

 

NM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ask Investment

 

 

 

 

FY19

4,908

 

1,251

 

1,950

 

25%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

FY18

 

 

4,649

 

 

1,211

 

 

1,934

 

 

26%

 

 

Managers Pvt. Ltd.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY17

3,328

 

752

 

 

NA

 

23%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Centrum Wealth

 

 

 

 

 

FY20

 

 

764

 

 

-369

 

 

-244

 

 

NM

 

 

 

 

Standalone

 

 

FY19

1,238

 

1

 

94

 

 

NM

 

Management Ltd.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY18

 

 

975

 

 

107

 

 

247

 

 

11%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Avendus Wealth

 

 

 

 

FY20

571

 

-344

 

-323

 

-60%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Standalone

 

FY19

 

 

686

 

 

-183

 

 

-176

 

 

-27%

 

 

Management Pvt. Ltd.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY18

460

 

-105

 

-101

 

 

NM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY21

 

 

1,271

 

 

275

 

 

383

 

 

22%

 

 

Motilal Oswal Wealth

 

 

Standalone

 

 

FY20

1,007

 

61

 

98

 

6%

 

 

Management Pvt. Ltd

 

 

 

 

FY19

 

 

1,104

 

 

153

 

 

226

 

 

14%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY18

1,036

 

266

 

374

 

26%

 

 

Ambit Wealth Advisors

 

 

 

 

FY20

 

 

3

 

 

-68

 

 

-59

 

 

NM

 

 

 

Standalone

 

FY19

7

 

-24

 

 

NM

 

 

NM

 

Pvt. Ltd.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY18

 

 

8

 

 

4

 

 

NM

 

 

52%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-Investors Presentation) *NM – Not meaningful

Page 44 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

In recent years there has been growing concern that individual IFA’s and even small advice firms are being forced out of the market. For many, the weight and cost of complying with regulation have become too heavy to bear if they aren’t shared in a corporate environment with a large support staff that brings economies of scale. This has created some concern that independent financial advice is going to be harder and harder to find. If not because large wealth managers are absorbing smaller players, but because many individual advisors feel it is simply too risky to operate independently.

However, the growing use of technology in the industry may provide a way for IFAs to manage the costs and risks of operating on their own.

Following are the major players who provide a technology platform for IFAs to service their clients & grow their business as on March-2021.

 

Sr. No.

 

 

Technology Platform

 

 

Subscribed IFAs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Providers for IFAs

 

 

(appx)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

OFA

 

 

5000+

 

2

 

 

IFA Planet

4200

 

 

3

 

 

DataComp (Wealth Magic)

 

 

3000

 

4

 

 

Redvision

3000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

Investwell

 

 

2500

 

6

 

 

Finsys

2500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

Vijaya

 

 

1600

 

8

 

 

Optimum

1450

 

 

9

 

 

IFA Now

 

 

1000

 

10

 

 

Ticker Wealth

1000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source: CART)

Distributor Commissions

As per AMFI, the commissions paid by mutual funds to distributors grew from ₹24,000 million in

fiscal 2013 to ₹66,166 million in fiscal 2021, representing a CAGR of 13.50%. Increased financial

savings, superior returns from mutual funds, greater reliance on distributors and government policies

acted as key catalysts in driving the distribution revenue growth.

Linking of expense ratios with asset size: To cut the cost of investing, SEBI linked expense ratios with

asset slabs in September 2018. This enforced schemes with higher asset size to charge lower expense

ratios. By doing so, SEBI updated accommodated schemes that had become larger over the years.

The total expense ratio (TER) includes expenses such as fund management fee and distribution

commissions. Due to this the total MF distributor commission has reduced in FY19 by 7.06% y-o-y

and 22.41% y-o-y in FY20.

Page 45 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

(Source-AMFI)

Mutual Fund Distributors Commission- Non Bank Category FY2020-21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(₹ in Million)

 

Sr. No.

 

 

 

Name of the ARN Holder

 

 

Gross

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

Net

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Yield on

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Inflows

 

 

 

Inflows

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

NJ IndiaInvest Pvt Ltd

 

 

8,739

 

 

 

3,28,872

 

 

 

4,688

 

 

 

 

7,70,050

 

 

1.13%

 

 

 

2

 

Prudent Corporate Advisory

 

2,632

 

 

1,01,598

 

5,051

 

 

2,49,147

 

 

1.06%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Services Ltd

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Anand Rathi Wealth Limited

 

 

988

 

 

 

1,57,500

 

 

 

-797

 

 

 

 

1,11,268

 

 

0.89%

 

 

 

4

 

Darshan Services Private Limited

 

917

 

 

5,97,125

 

1,41,682

 

1,80,272

 

 

0.51%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

IIFL Wealth Finance Limited

 

 

888

 

 

 

4,23,850

 

 

 

-48,478

 

 

 

 

2,34,796

 

 

0.38%

 

 

 

6

 

Julius Baer Wealth Advisors

 

709

 

 

1,16,605

 

9,105

 

 

1,51,804

 

 

0.47%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(India) Private Limited

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

Bajaj Capital Ltd.

 

 

655

 

 

 

36,449

 

 

 

-8,442

 

 

 

 

 

90,946

 

 

0.72%

 

 

 

8

 

Karvy Stock Broking Limited

 

596

 

 

38,880

 

-15,484

 

 

 

 

 

93,022

 

 

0.64%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

JM Financial Services Limited

 

 

591

 

 

 

1,32,751

 

 

 

-1,407

 

 

 

 

1,07,585

 

 

0.55%

 

 

 

10

 

Geojit Financial Services Ltd

 

480

 

 

18,397

 

 

-880

 

 

 

 

 

47,104

 

 

1.02%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-AMFI)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Non-Bank Category excludes banks and its affiliates

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mutual Fund Distributors Commission- Non Bank Category FY 2019-20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in Million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

Net

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Yield on

 

 

 

 

 

Sr. No

 

 

Name of the ARN Holder

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Inflows

 

 

Inflows

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

NJ IndiaInvest Pvt Ltd

 

 

 

7,772

 

 

3,02,492

 

 

51,843

 

 

7,15,608

 

 

 

1.09%

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

Prudent Corporate Advisory Services Ltd

 

2,297

 

 

1,18,460

 

 

24,422

 

2,26,367

 

1.01%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

Anand Rathi Wealth Limited

 

 

 

1,149

 

 

4,06,325

 

 

23,109

 

 

1,29,225

 

 

 

0.89%

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

IIFL Wealth Management Limited

 

 

1,005

 

 

6,41,429

 

 

-25,721

 

1,89,904

 

0.53%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

Julius Baer Wealth Advisors (India)

 

 

731

 

 

1,10,989

 

 

-14,708

 

 

1,38,850

 

 

 

0.53%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Private Limited

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

Bajaj Capital Ltd.

 

 

718

 

 

40,974

 

 

 

-3,274

 

98,267

 

0.73%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 46 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

 

7

Karvy Stock Broking Limited

666

57,836

-4,436

1,03,468

0.64%

 

 

8

Pioneer Client Associates Private Limited

523

48,851

-4,769

67,834

0.77%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

JM Financial Services Limited

509

3,97,807

-21,842

1,10,779

0.46%

 

 

10

Geojit Financial Services Ltd

440

22,383

6,372

45,615

0.96%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-AMFI)

Note: Non-Bank Category excludes banks and its affiliates

Mutual Fund Distributors Commission- Non-Bank Category FY 2018-19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in Million)

 

 

Gross

Gross

Net

Average

Yield on

Sr. No

Name of the ARN Holder

Average

Amount

Inflows

Inflows

Assets

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

NJ IndiaInvest Pvt Ltd

8,077

283,566

111,487

629,466

1.28%

2

 

Prudent Corporate Advisory Services Ltd

2,347

 

113,772

 

40,813

 

190,333

 

1.23%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Anand Rathi Wealth Limited

 

 

1,211

 

 

278,943

 

 

16,340

 

 

112,416

 

 

1.08%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

IIFL Wealth Management Limited

1,761

 

1,446,158

 

-35,901

 

305,682

 

0.58%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

Julius Baer Wealth Advisors (India)

 

 

906

 

 

109,628

 

 

1,615

 

 

138,380

 

 

0.65%

 

 

 

Private Limited

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

 

Bajaj Capital Ltd.

921

 

60,648

 

-1,447

 

101,275

 

0.91%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

Karvy Stock Broking Limited

 

 

880

 

 

71,965

 

 

10,385

 

 

101,702

 

 

0.87%

 

8

 

Pioneer Client Associates Private Limited

593

 

32,480

 

2,343

 

63,188

 

0.94%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

JM Financial Services Limited

 

 

622

 

 

581,221

 

 

-21,257

 

 

119,263

 

 

0.52%

 

10

 

Geojit Financial Services Ltd

463

 

27,104

 

10,602

 

38,153

 

1.21%

 

(Source-AMFI)

Note: Non-Bank Category excludes banks and its affiliates

Mutual Fund Distributors Commission- Foreign Bank Category FY 2020-21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in Million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

Gross

 

 

Net

 

 

Average

 

 

Yield on

 

 

 

Sr. No.

 

 

Name of the ARN Holder

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Inflows

 

 

Inflows

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

Citibank N.A.

 

 

1,073

 

 

1,44,012

 

 

-11,298

 

 

2,15,368

 

 

0.50%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

Hongkong & Shanghai Banking

845

 

1,00,456

 

3,788

 

1,67,254

 

0.51%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation Ltd.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

Standard Chartered Bank

 

 

767

 

 

81,488

 

 

-6,172

 

 

1,47,125

 

 

0.52%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

Deutsche Bank AG

361

 

67,126

 

-8,429

 

84,045

 

0.43%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

DBS Bank India Limited

 

 

76

 

 

10,243

 

 

-3,445

 

 

19,125

 

 

0.40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-AMFI)

Mutual Fund Distributors Commission- Foreign Bank Category FY 2019-20

(in Million)

Page 47 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

Gross

 

 

Net

 

 

Average

 

 

Yield on

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sr. No

 

 

Name of the ARN Holder

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Inflows

 

 

Inflows

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

Citibank N.A.

 

 

1,145

 

 

1,37,660

 

 

-31,567

 

 

2,58,838

 

 

0.44%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

Hongkong & Shanghai Banking

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.53%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation Ltd.

996

 

90,389

 

-3,460

 

1,88,416

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

Standard Chartered Bank

 

 

765

 

 

96,404

 

 

-19,265

 

 

1,60,837

 

 

0.48%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

Deutsche Bank AG

394

 

49,870

 

218

 

96,282

 

0.41%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

DBS Bank India Limited

 

 

77

 

 

9,09,406

 

 

7,922

 

 

20,646

 

 

0.37%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-AMFI)

Mutual Fund Distributors Commission- Foreign Bank Category FY 2018-19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

Net

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Yield on

 

 

 

 

 

Sr. No.

 

 

 

 

Name of the ARN Holder

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount paid

 

 

Inflows

 

 

Inflows

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

Citibank N.A

 

 

 

1,818

 

 

 

 

1,46,246

 

 

-8,692

 

 

 

 

2,86,642

 

 

0.63%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

Standard Chartered Bank

 

 

1,507

 

 

 

1,13,552

 

-526

 

 

 

1,79,049

 

0.84%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

Hongkong & Shanghai Banking

 

 

 

1,136

 

 

 

 

85,601

 

 

20,787

 

 

 

1,81,067

 

 

0.63%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporation Ltd.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

Deutsche Bank AG

 

 

511

 

 

 

 

41,984

 

-5,073

 

 

 

97,879

 

0.52%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

DBS Bank Ltd.

 

 

 

172

 

 

 

 

 

2,912

 

 

-338

 

 

 

 

8,020

 

 

2.15%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-AMFI)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mutual Fund Distributors Commission- Indian Bank Category FY 2020-21

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in Million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

Net

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

Yield on

 

 

 

 

Sr. No.

 

 

 

Name of the ARN Holder

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

Inflows

 

 

Inflows

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

State Bank of India

 

 

4,886

 

 

 

6,72,156

 

 

91,670

 

 

 

 

9,67,115

 

 

0.51%

 

 

 

2

 

 

Axis Bank Limited

 

3,930

 

 

 

3,49,775

 

 

-59,426

 

 

 

 

4,39,480

 

0.89%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

HDFC Bank Limited

 

 

3,440

 

 

 

7,59,135

 

 

-78,422

 

 

 

 

6,71,489

 

 

0.51%

 

 

 

4

 

 

ICICI Bank Limited

 

2,272

 

 

 

2,18,014

 

 

-39,200

 

 

 

 

3,85,263

 

0.59%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited

 

 

1,730

 

 

 

1,91,029

 

 

-28,512

 

 

 

 

3,23,986

 

 

0.53%

 

 

 

 

(Source-AMFI)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mutual Fund Distributors Commission- Indian Bank Category FY 2019-20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in Million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

Net

 

 

Average

 

 

Yield on

 

 

 

 

 

Sr. No

 

 

 

Name of the ARN Holder

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

Inflows

 

 

Inflows

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

Axis Bank Limited

 

 

 

4,159

 

 

 

 

6,86,613

 

 

-38,435

 

 

 

5,01,260

 

 

0.83%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

 

State Bank of India

 

3,749

 

 

 

6,41,257

 

1,30,268

 

8,15,289

 

0.46%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

HDFC Bank Limited

 

 

 

2,941

 

 

 

 

11,21,640

 

-18,054

 

 

 

7,14,123

 

 

0.41%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 48 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

 

3

ICICI Bank Limited

1,856

2,22,872

-19,836

4,05,851

0.46%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited

1,594

3,05,356

-98,959

3,55,670

0.45%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-AMFI)

Mutual Fund Distributors Commission- Indian Bank Category FY 2018-19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in Million)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sr. No

 

 

Name of the ARN Holder

 

 

Gross

 

 

Gross

 

 

Net

 

 

Average

 

 

Yield on

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

Inflows

 

 

Inflows

 

 

Assets

 

 

Average Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

Axis Bank Limited

 

 

5,556

 

 

1,345,501

 

 

7,558

 

 

529,231

 

 

1.05%

 

2

 

 

HDFC Bank Limited

4,967

 

1,367,906

 

24,305

 

729,439

 

0.68%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

State Bank of India

 

 

4,876

 

 

920,813

 

 

153,682

 

 

642,800

 

 

0.76%

 

3

 

 

ICICI Bank Limited

3,553

 

231,425

 

7,389

 

418,032

 

0.85%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited

 

 

2,550

 

 

345,036

 

 

-36,280

 

 

375,548

 

 

0.68%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-AMFI)

Page 49 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

OUTLOOK FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY IN INDIA

A. Shift in savings from physical assets to financial assets

Historically, households in India have been quite risk averse and wary of investing their savings into volatile or uncertain return-based assets. A pursuit of safe bets has always driven India towards making investments in physical assets like gold. However, this pattern is slowly changing over time, especially post announcement of demonetization in November 2016. Also, the country has seen a major shift in attitude from capital preservation to wealth creation since FY17.

With a likely growth rate of India’s GDP projected at 9.2% in 2022, the country will remain a key growth driver of global economy. Against this backdrop, individual wealth in India is expected to grow at a CAGR of 11.76% till FY25 and is likely to nearly double to Rs. 8,11,293 billion by FY25*. In the next five years, financial assets will witness much faster growth rate as compared to physical assets. As far as individual contribution is concerned, financial assets are expected to form almost 63% of the total individual assets by FY25 vs 57% in FY20, physical assets are expected to be restricted to 37% of the total wealth vs 43% in FY20*. The reduction in bank deposit rates in the past year has further led to a shift in investment to mutual funds and the stock markets.

*(Source-Karvy India Wealth Report 2020)

The implementation of various reforms such as GST, RERA, new insolvency and bankruptcy code and recapitalization of banks & Corporate Tax cuts among others are likely to shift informal sectors into the formal economy and hence, boost GDP growth and individual wealth in the medium to long term.

 

 

 

 

(Rs. in Billion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Category

FY 15

FY 16

FY 17

FY18

FY19

FY20

FY25P

Financial Assets

160,560

177,880

201,289

236,347

2,62,106

2,62,912

5,12,157

Physical Assets

119,890

132,270

142,894

156,101

1,67,942

2,02,282

2,99,136

Total

280,450

310,150

344,182

392,448

4,30,048

4,65,194

8,11,293

(Source-Karvy India Wealth Report 2020)

(Source-Karvy India Wealth Report 2020)

Page 50 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

a. Projected financial wealth – Asset Class Wise distribution in FY25

Financial assets are likely to almost double by FY25 to reach a figure of Rs. 5,12,157 billion as compared to Rs. 2,62,912 billion in FY20. Direct Equity investments is expected to be the key growth driver for the future and expected to grow at a CAGR of more than 21.9% over the next 5 years. The positive sentiment also helped propel Mutual Funds which grew at over 17.9% over the previous year as individuals increasingly identify this asset class as a better way to participate in the equity markets. It is therefore expected that by FY25, the share of financial assets in the total investment pool will rise to 63% from 57% in FY20.

Projected Financial Wealth Asset Class Wise Distribution

(Rs. in Billion)

 

Category

 

 

FY17

 

 

FY18

 

 

FY19

 

 

FY20

 

 

FY25

 

 

Proportion

 

 

Proportion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY20

 

 

FY25

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Deposits & Bonds

 

 

39,093

 

 

42,097

 

 

45,820

 

 

48,691

 

 

78,357

 

 

18.52%

 

 

15.30%

 

Direct Equity

37,583

 

48,976

 

 

52,103

 

36,115

97,319

13.74%

19.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance

 

 

30,012

 

 

33,359

 

 

36,907

 

 

38,020

 

 

68,895

 

 

14.46%

 

 

13.45%

 

Saving Deposits

28,837

 

30,968

 

 

34,223

 

37,455

53,762

14.25%

10.50%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

12,641

 

 

17,597

 

 

20,522

 

 

23,497

 

 

33,933

 

 

8.94%

 

 

6.63%

 

Provident Fund

13,043

 

14,482

 

 

16,628

 

20,438

36,720

7.77%

7.17%

 

Mutual Funds

 

 

8,684

 

 

11,680

 

 

13,770

 

 

11,909

 

 

27,151

 

 

4.53%

 

 

5.30%

 

NRI Deposits

7,572

 

8,197

 

 

9,020

 

10,326

17,164

3.93%

3.35%

 

Unlisted Equity

 

 

6,986

 

 

9,559

 

 

10,543

 

 

13,032

 

 

60,035

 

 

4.96%

 

 

11.72%

 

Small Savings

6,679

 

7,366

 

 

8,610

 

9,836

15,070

3.74%

2.94%

 

Current Deposits

 

 

4,132

 

 

4,309

 

 

4,872

 

 

2,118

 

 

3,036

 

 

0.81%

 

 

0.59%

 

Pension Funds

4,752

 

6,039

 

 

7,249

 

9,017

15,289

3.43%

2.99%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alternative Investments

 

 

930

 

 

1,241

 

 

1,491

 

 

2,000

 

 

4,247

 

 

0.76%

 

 

0.83%

 

International assets

207

 

260

 

 

341

 

458

1,181

0.17%

0.23%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sukanya Samriddhi

 

 

138

 

 

216

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

2,01,289

2,36,347

 

2,62,106

 

2,62,912

5,12,157

100.00%

 

100.00%

 

(Source-Karvy India Wealth Report 2020)

India has the lowest mutual fund penetration globally. The total Assets under Management (AUM) to GDP ratio of India stands at a mere 16% below the global average of 63% in 2020. Countries like US have AUM to GDP ratios of over 100%. Hence, the mutual fund industry in the country presents huge scope for growth and development.

Page 51 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

b. Projected physical wealth – Asset Class Wise distribution in FY24

Despite rise in share of financial assets, physical assets will remain resilient to an extent. Individual wealth in physical assets is likely to grow at a CAGR of 7.56% to around Rs. 270,783 billion in FY24 from Rs. 202,282 billion in FY20. Real estate (43.67% contribution in FY24) and gold (48.69% contribution in FY24) will remain the most favored asset classes in the overall physical assets pie. Meanwhile, performance of physical assets will remain subdued as compared to financial assets primarily due to factors like attitudinal shift, liquidity, faster growth of equity markets among others.

Projected Physical Wealth Asset Class wise Distribution

(Rs. in Billion)

 

Category

 

 

FY17

 

 

FY18

 

 

FY19

 

 

FY20

 

 

FY24

 

 

Proportion

 

 

Proportion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY20

 

 

FY24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

 

 

68,450

 

 

74,513

 

 

80,941

 

 

1,09,500

 

 

1,31,848

 

 

54.13%

 

 

48.69%

 

Real Estate

60,250

 

69,568

 

74,529

 

80,145

 

1,18,247

 

39.62%

 

43.67%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diamond

 

 

7,980

 

 

8,384

 

 

8,581

 

 

8,304

 

 

14,318

 

 

4.11%

 

 

5.29%

 

Silver

2,290

 

1,319

 

2,427

 

2,854

 

3,718

 

1.41%

 

1.37%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Platinum

 

 

70

 

 

77

 

 

85

 

 

82

 

 

129

 

 

0.04%

 

 

0.05%

 

Others Gems and Jewellery

1,050

 

2,243

 

1,376

 

1,394

 

2,520

 

0.69%

 

0.93%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

140,100

 

 

1,56,104

 

 

167,942

 

 

2,02,282

 

 

2,70,783

 

 

100.00%

 

 

100.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-Karvy India Wealth Report 2020)

Wider Reach of Wealth Management Industry

Increasing awareness levels, attitudinal shift to grow wealth rather than preserve wealth and the advancements in technology would define the wealth management needs of this potential clientele. The players who would be successful in catering to this increased demand would be required to develop cost effective methods to service this clientele in a relevant manner. Technology adoption is likely to play an important role in deciding the winners in this sub segment.

Consolidation in Indian Wealth Management Industry

The wealth management industry is also witnessing market consolidation along its value chain. In addition, private equity funds are increasingly looking to participate in the growth story of Indian wealth management industry.

Page 52 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Key transactions in Indian Wealth Management/Asset Management Industry

Date

Target

Investor

 

 

 

Jan-2021

Principal Asset Management

Sundaram Asset Management Company

 

 

(Acquisition 338.53 crore (US$ 46.78 million)).

 

 

 

Sep-20

Groww Wealth Management

YC Continuity fund & Sequoia India

 

 

Invested US$ 30 Million

 

 

 

Aug-20

Edelweiss Global Wealth

PAG agreed to invest Rs. 2244 Crs for 51 % stake

 

Management limited

 

 

 

 

Aug-20

Yes Bank MF

White Oak Capital Management

 

 

 

Dec-19

Waterfield Advisors

Zephyr Management, Vernalis Capital, Gaja

 

 

Advisors, TVS Capital Funds, Dalmia Family

 

 

Office, Individuals

 

 

 

Nov-19

IDBI AMC

Muthoot Finance

 

 

 

Aug-19

L&T Capital Markets Ltd

IIFL Wealth Management Ltd.

 

 

 

June - 19

Wadhawan Wealth Managers Pvt.

LGT Impact Ventures

 

Ltd. (Subject to regulatory

 

 

approval)

 

 

 

 

Oct-18

Wealth Advisors

IIFL Wealth Management Ltd.

 

 

 

Jun-18

IIFL Wealth Management

Ward Ferry, RIMCO, Amansa, GA, Steadview,

 

 

HDFC Life

 

 

 

Apr-18

Sanctum Wealth Management

Multiples Alternate Asset Management Pvt. Ltd.

 

Pvt. Ltd.

 

 

 

 

Dec-17

Fullerton Securities & Wealth

Blueblood Ventures Ltd.

 

Advisors Ltd.

 

 

 

 

Feb-17

Religare Wealth Management Ltd.

Anand Rathi Wealth Services Ltd.

 

 

 

Dec-16

ASK Investment Managers Pvt.

Advent India PE Advisors Private Ltd.

 

Ltd.

 

 

 

 

Apr-16

The Royal Bank of Scotland NV

Sanctum Wealth Management Pvt. Ltd.

 

India

 

 

 

 

Oct-15

IIFL Wealth Management Ltd.

General Atlantic LLC

 

 

 

May-13

Morgan Stanley Private Wealth

Standard Chartered Bank

 

Management

 

 

 

 

Other trends in India’s wealth management space

There is increasing trend of HNIs investing in unlisted equity to be part of the startup / private equity story apart from the quest to have higher anticipated returns on account of unlocking of potential valuations upon listing on stock exchanges. There is an increasing trend of ultra HNIs looking at engaging with Family Office set-ups to not only help them in managing investments but also help in ensuring a relevant structure to preserve, grow and manage their wealth for generations to come.

Page 53 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Emergence of Robo Advisors:

1. Impact of robo-advisors on the wealth management space

The new mass affluent investors have not been well-served by traditional private wealth managers, especially because of the absence of a viable business model. Financial advice from such traditional wealth managers requires a higher minimum investment than what many small investors can afford. The only available option so far for such investors was to either do it themselves, or avail the services of distributors or IFA’s, or explore traditional investment instruments such as term deposits.

With the introduction of robo-advisors, investors have access to the same professional advice at a lower cost and with a more affordable minimum investment amount. Robo-advisors have brought accessibility, transparency, simplicity and unbiased opinion to the whole investment process, especially for small investors. It is more attractive to a generation that demands speed, customisation, accuracy and control from their financial advisers. With new use of data, analytics span the spectrum from institutional trading and risk management to even small notional retail wealth management.

Globally as well, Robo-advisors are swarming into the wealth management industry. They have been able to develop a streamlined digital experience for clients, which had been largely lacking in traditional wealth managers’ digital offerings. This combined with increased transparency and lower fees have the ability to make wealth advice economically feasible for the mass market.

Globally, the current market share of robo-advisor firms is marginal as they have only gained a miniscule share of (AUM) but several companies already have over US$ 1bn of AUM. Several research studies forecast that robo-advisors are going to witness significant growth going forward as these firms have managed to make quality financial advice available across demographics at an affordable cost. Robo-advisors will be key to unlocking access to the mass market services, which, in turn, would help in growing the overall wealth management market. Moreover, these firms have received strong funding support from venture capital funds. The study predicts that the total market size for hybrid robo-advisors (Hybrid Robo-advisory is robo-advisory with substantial component of human interaction to the use of software for the client advisory process) will further increase to US$

16.3trillion by 2025, which will be 10% of total investable wealth around the world by that date. In contrast pure robo-advisors (fully automated) are likely to hold only 1.6% of the total global wealth by the middle of the next decade.

Robo-advisors steps to streamline the client online experience, provide greater transparency and improve the economics for the mass segments are irreversible and they are making traditional financial advisers rethink their business models. According to research by Accenture, robo advisors could result in possible fee reduction of as much as 70% for some services. Traditional advisors will

Page 54 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

need to ensure that their service offering is commensurate with the fees tagged to it. Moreover, robo-advisors will also force traditional advisers to increase focus on their digital channels.

2. International trends in robo-advisory

Since the launch of Robo Advisory, it has gained significant traction. There are predominantly two types of players in this space internationally 1) independent robo-advisors 2) Leading investment managers with robo-advisor capabilities. Below are some of the key players operating in this space.

Leading Independent Robo-advisors

1. Betterment

4.Wealthfront

 

2.Hedgeable

5.WiseBanyan

 

 

 

 

3.SigFig Wealth Management

6.Personal Capital Corporation

 

 

 

 

Leading Investment Managers With Robo-advisor capabilities built in-house or acquired through MLA

1.

Fidelity Investments

10.

NatWest Holdings Limited

2.

UBS Group AG

11.

Royal Bank of Canada

 

 

 

 

3.

Legg Mason

12.

The Charles Schwab Corporation

4.

Morgan Stanley

13.

The Vanguard Group

 

 

 

 

5.

HSBC Holdings

14.

John Hancock

6.

Bank of America Corporation (Merrill Lynch)

15.

E-Trade Financial Corporation

 

 

 

 

7.

Envestment Management

16.

Goldman Sachs

8.

Capital One Financial Corporation

17.

BlackRock

 

 

 

 

9.

TIAA Holdings

18.

CBOE Global Markets

 

 

 

 

Robo-advisory market is expected to grow to US$ 5tn by 2025.

Page 55 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

With over 300% growth expected in AUM managed by Robo-Advising (AUM (US$B))

340%

(Source-Reuters, Gartner, Venture Scanner, Press search)

Partnership route has also been actively pursued as the same can deliver promptly-realized advantages through process automation, cost reduction and the attraction of new customers. This route also avoids the costs and risks inherent in implementing a customer solution into legacy systems. Select transactions in this route include:

Partnerships

1.U.S. Bancorp -> Motif Investing

2.Pershing ->Marstone Limited

3.RBC Advisor Services ->Next Capital Advisers Inc.

4.Wells Fargo & Co ->SigFig Wealth Management

5.BBVA Compass ->Future Advisor (Owned by BlackRock Inc)

Other leading players including Standard Chartered, Charles Schwab, UBS, Vanguard, Deutsche Bank, Fidelity and Merrill Lynch have tried to build robo advisory capabilities in-house. The objective has been to enable advisors to promote it as a low-cost alternative to traditional advisory services and provides the flexibility to offer varying functionality to help attract new investors.

Robo-advisory platforms of established players have proven successful in gaining market share:

Page 56 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

The Vanguard Group is an American registered investment advisor based in Malvern, Pennsylvania. It is the largest provider of mutual funds and the second-largest provider of exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the world. In addition to mutual funds and ETFs, Vanguard offers brokerage services, variable and fixed annuities, educational account services, financial planning, asset management, and trust services. Several mutual funds managed by Vanguard are ranked at the top of the list of US mutual funds by assets under management. Vanguard offers two classes of most of its funds: investor shares and admiral shares.

(Source-Statista.com)

Schwab Intelligent Portfolios offers tax-loss harvesting, rebalancing, and other features. Additionally, Schwab Intelligent Portfolios also provides human advisor-assisted services although not dedicated financial advisors like Personal Capital or Betterment Premium.

(Source-Statista.com)

Page 57 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Value of AUM of selected Robo-advisors worldwide as of March 2021

(Source-Statista.com)

Risks to Wealth Management Industry

Going forward, we expect wealth managers to focus on the below areas that will impact the industry.

Regulatory landscape: Regulators are moving their focus towards other parts of the financial system including private wealth managers. There is an increased regulatory focus on transparency of pricing, fees and independence of PWMs. Changes to commission and incentive structures and obligations could change intermediaries’ product selection processes. Regulation of distribution through digital channels and robo-advice could also change.

Privacy: Security and privacy are HNWIs’ key concerns about digital technology, and more than half of HNWIs are concerned about exploitation generally. However, they are becoming increasingly comfortable with the use of technology and now expect online and digital functionality in many aspects of their lives. Wealth managers will have to continue to strengthen their existing infrastructure to protect against potential security breaches.

Business model disruption: The rise of technology solutions could disrupt the value chain including competition from quantitative investment technologies that have the potential to assimilate more data and make investment decisions, and which will help to realize alpha more efficiently than active managers. Increased investment and asset allocation through robo-advice services could displace active management and an increased asset allocation to passive investments.

Rising costs: Rising costs within the industry driven by changing and increasing regulatory requirements and technological advancement could impact margins. This effect is further accentuated by downward pressure on fees charged by the wealth managers.

Page 58 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Regulatory Guidelines on Wealth Management Services:

The regulatory environment in the Indian wealth management industry is still evolving. This presents opportunities for established wealth managers to expand their offerings. Regulations covering fiduciary duties and investor protection are imminent.

Some key proposals/guidelines by regulators affecting the Indian wealth management space:

SRO for wealth management

In 2011, capital markets regulator, SEBI proposed an SRO for the Indian wealth management sector that would help regulate business and serve as a medium for SEBI to implement various wealth management initiatives.

Investment advisor guidelines by SEBI

SEBI’s Investors Advisor Regulations, which came into force in January 2013, focuses on the independence of investment advisors. According to the new regulations, investment advisory services have to be separated from all other activities such as distribution. A distributor can sell product but cannot offer advice. In addition, banks, NBFCs and various corporate bodies would have to set up a separate subsidiary for investment advisory services.

Any entity/individual willing to engage in the business of providing investment advice to clients is required to be registered with SEBI. Moreover, an investment advisor should be professionally qualified, with a post-graduate degree in finance, accountancy, business management, banking, etc. or a graduate degree with relevant experience of at least five years. The individual also needs to be certified by NISM or FPSB. To be an investment advisor, corporate bodies need to have a minimum net worth of Rs.2.5 million and individuals Rs.0.1 million.

Investors should ensure proper risk-profiling of clients, and the investment advice provided should be appropriate to the client’s risk profile. Investors also need to maintain a record of KYC, risk profiling and assessment, suitability assessment of advice provided, agreements with clients, investment advice provided (written as well as oral), rationale for arriving at investment advice and a list of clients with date of advice, nature of advice and fees charged.

SEBI guidelines for MF scheme classification

SEBI introduced guidelines in October 2017 on consolidation and merger of mutual fund schemes with the aim to make it simpler for the investors to compare various mutual fund schemes. Moreover, it will reduce the clutter and make it simple to compare performance amid a level-playing field.

Page 59 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

In a bid to reduce the number of schemes in mutual funds, SEBI recently came out with uniform definitions for fund categories. SEBI’s move will be applicable only on open-ended funds. The market regulator has broadly divided mutual funds into five categories-

Equity funds

Debt funds

Hybrid funds

Solution-oriented funds

Other funds

To ensure uniformity, the following definitions of large cap, mid cap and small cap were adopted:

Large Cap: 1st -100th company in terms of full market capitalization

Mid Cap: 101st -250th company in terms of full market capitalization

Small Cap: 251st company onwards in terms of full market capitalization

Overall, there are over 1,789 Schemes in the industry. Out of them, 696 are close-ended Schemes, 1018 are open-ended Schemes as on March 2021. (Source: www.sebi.gov.in)

The RBI’s guidelines on regulating wealth management services (WMS)

In June 2013, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued draft guidelines on wealth management and distribution services offered by banks:

In April 2016, RBI asked banks that currently offer investment advisory services through an internal department to reorganize their operations within three years and set up a subsidiary for investment advisory services. This is to ensure an arm’s length distance between banking activities and investment advisory services. Banks will need specific approval from the RBI to set up the subsidiary. The subsidiary would have to be registered with SEBI and would be subsequently regulated by SEBI.

Banks must ensure segregation of the marketing function from operational processes, such as approval/transaction processes at branches. Banks must ensure that the sales process is transparent and products are sold through trained employees in bank branches. Banks should strictly follow KYC and AML rules, have a robust internal grievance redressal machinery, and prevent their staff from receiving any incentive (cash as well as non-cash) directly from a third-party issuer.

Regulatory pressure is forcing wealth management players to rework operating models

After the announcement of the Investor Advisors Guidelines, there has been increased focus on client centricity, fiduciary responsibility and compliance. Regulatory requirements regarding advisor qualifications, infrastructure, risk profiling and suitability criteria have become more stringent. For

Page 60 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

the past few years, there has been a push from regulators and industry bodies to move toward a trail commission– based model and reduce up-front commissions to reduce misselling and the chances of churn.

One of the biggest impediments to the current wealth management model is the stipulation that investment advisors must maintain an arm’s length from distribution activities. The income of investment advisors must be in the form of fees from clients and not through commissions earned on the distribution of mutual fund products. Players are skeptical about separating advisory and distribution businesses as this may prove to be an inconvenience. Moreover, the cost of running two separate firms is high.

Additional regulatory layer proposed by SEBI may keep foreign players away from Indian wealth management business

With the aim to root out undeclared wealth and ensure tax compliance, SEBI wants to gain oversight of foreign banks managing Indian wealth. The capital market regulator has reached out to large international banks and wealth managers to register their offshore units with SEBI if they are soliciting business in India. By registering with SEBI, private banks would have to admit to managing funds of wealthy Indian clients and may also prompt further requests from SEBI to share information. Many foreign banks and wealth managers have already exited the Indian wealth management business because of the high cost of operations and regulatory burden. This might deter foreign players from having any presence in the Indian wealth management segment and offering services to wealthy Indians. The Royal Bank of Scotland NV India and Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management are Foreign Players who have recently exited the wealth management business in India.

Government Initiatives to improve financial inclusion:

The Government has undertaken certain key initiatives to promote financial inclusion in the country. This is expected to further increase financial savings as more people have access to financial services. A few of the key reforms are described below:

Pradhan Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana-Launched in August 2014, the PMJDY scheme aims to bring all the citizens under the purview of formal banking system and ensure access to financial services at an affordable price, including savings and deposit bank accounts, remittances, credit and insurance.

Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana-Launched in 2015, the PMJJBY is a Government-backed insurance scheme that offers life insurance coverage of Rs.200,000 in exchange for an annual premium of Rs.330 per member, which is renewable every year.

Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana: The PMSBY is an accident insurance scheme that provides a coverage of Rs.200,000 for accidental death and permanent total disability, and Rs.100,000 for permanent partial disability, in exchange for an annual premium of Rs.12 per member. Over 100 million people have registered for the PMJJBY and PMSBY insurance schemes.

Page 61 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

(Source- PMDJY.gov.in)

 

No. of Accounts Opened under

 

 

 

Jan-15

 

 

Sep-2021*

 

PMJDY (In Million)

 

 

Rural

Urban

 

No of

Rural

Urban

No Of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts

 

 

Accounts

 

Public Sector Bank

 

 

53.3

45.1

 

98.4

214.1

129.0

343.1

 

Rural Regional Bank

 

18.5

3.3

 

21.8

69.1

9.8

78.9

 

Private Banks

 

 

3.2

2

 

5.2

7.0

5.7

12.7

 

Total

 

75

50.5

 

125.5

279.3

143.8

434.7

 

*Data as on 22-September-2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aadhaar Programme: India launched Aadhaar in 2009 with the then-improbable goal of giving every Indian a single digital identity in the form of a biometric authenticated 12-digit number. Citizen identity is an important aspect of effective governance. It is the world’s largest biometric ID system, with over 1.30 billion unique identification accounts as of August 31, 2021. Aadhaar - enabled transactions are playing a huge role in contributing to the government’s mission of making India a less-cash economy by enabling seamless electronic KYC.

Mobile: Mobile has become an integral part of life for almost everyone in the last decade. The evolution in communication technology provides opportunities for the government to connect to the citizens and provide better governance. Currently India is the 2nd largest telecom market in the world with 1.18 billion subscribers out of which 1.16 billion use wireless means to communicate. There is an exponential rise in terms of internet users as well as smartphone users in the country. The lack of banking infrastructure poses a serious problem mostly in rural India for getting money from banks to the last man. Additionally, over the last few years, the Government has actively

Page 62 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

undertaken multiple initiatives to improve digitization in the Country. These include a combination of schemes to biometrically identify all Indian citizens with the Aadhaar programme and to promote financial inclusion through ‘Jan Dhan Yojana’, the launch of Aadhaar-enabled payments systems and encouraging online tax filings.

Increasing Smartphone penetration:

(Source-Statista.com)E- Estimated

Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT): The Government launched the DBT scheme, with an aim to transfer government subsidies and payments directly into the bank accounts of beneficiaries leading to higher transparency in the system. The introduction of PMJDY accounts has enhanced the effectiveness of the DBT scheme.

(Source- dbtbharat.gov.in)

Besides the above, the Government has also undertaken several key structural reforms for the economy. Key initiatives include:

Page 63 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Demonetization: On November 8 2016, the Government of India announced the demonetization of high currency notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 in order to tackle black money lower the cash circulation in the economy and to eliminate fake currency terrorism funding. Demonetization has nudged the Indian economy toward more formal ways of operating and saving and expanded the tax base. There has been an emphasis on digital payments. Demonetization has reduced the value of real estate (with an expected decline in real estate prices) and gold (with the curbs on cash transactions) as forms of savings. It led to a shift towards investment alternatives like capital market instruments such as mutual funds both directly and indirectly.

Goods and Services Tax (GST): GST has been implemented with effect from July 1, 2017 and has replaced the indirect taxes on goods and services such as central excise duty, service tax, central sales tax, state VAT and surcharge collected by the central and State Governments. GST will bring about a uniformity in process and centralized registration that will make starting a business and expanding in different states much simpler. GST’s objective is to simplify the tax regime by reducing the multiplicity of taxes. The gross GST revenue collected in the month of April 2021 is at a record high of Rs 1.41 trillion, of which CGST is Rs 278.37 billion, SGST Rs 356.21 billion, IGST Rs 684.81 billion (including Rs 295.99 billion collected on import of goods) and cess Rs 94.45 billion (including Rs 9.81 billion collected on import of goods).

Vaccination details

The vaccination exercise as a tool to protect the most vulnerable population groups in the country from COVID-19 continues to be regularly reviewed and monitored at the highest level.

The countrywide vaccination drive was rolled out on January 16, with the healthcare workers (HCWs) getting inoculated in the first phase. The vaccination of the frontline workers (FLWs) started from February 2. The next phase of COVID-19 vaccination commenced from March 1 for people over 60 years of age and those aged 45 years and above with specified co-morbid conditions. The country launched vaccination for all people aged above 45 years from April 1. The government then decided to expand its vaccination drive by allowing everyone above 18 years of age to be vaccinated from May 1.

Nearly 890 million COVID-19 vaccine doses have so far been administered in the country till 30th September 2021.

According to the ministry’s data, a total of 650 million first doses and 240 million second doses of the vaccine have been administered across the country.

Page 64 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

PRODUCT OVERVIEW

Structured Products

Structured Products / market-Linked debentures (MLD) are a blend of fixed-income and derivative instruments. Its layer of derivatives gives it the flexibility needed to blend with a portfolio and enhance its risk-to-return performance while matching an investor’s objectives.

Market-Linked Debentures (MLD) is a debt instrument that differs from a standard fixed-income security in the sense that the coupon on the instrument is linked to a variable market indicator such as an equity index, commodity price such as gold, etc. Structured Products / MLDs are generally close ended hybrid instruments which could be either with principle protection or without principle protection. The underlying security is generally a non-convertible debenture of the issuer linked to an equity index (nifty 50, bank nifty etc), 10 year G-Sec, gold index etc. They are issued for the period of 13 months to 60 months. Unlike a bond that pays a fixed interest either monthly, quarterly, half yearly or annually, MLDs do not pay any regular income, it comes only at maturity. Theoretically these MLDs can be considered to be a zero coupon bond and an embedded customized payoff that could be an equity option.

MLDs are primarily of two types. First type wherein MLD is a principal-protected instrument designed to return 100% of the original investment at maturity subject to credit risk of the issuer. While a portion of the capital may be invested by the issuer in debt instruments to bring in the feature of capital protection, the return may be linked to an external market indicator such as equity index to capture the market upside.

In the second type, the issuers may also issue non-principal protected instruments wherein both the principal as well as coupon are linked to performance of external market indices.

SEBI had released guidelines for issue and listing of structured products/market linked debentures on September 28, 2011. These guidelines specify that for Principal Protected Market Linked Debentures, credit rating agency shall prefix ‘PP-MLD’ followed by standardised rating symbols for long term/short term as per SEBI circular dated June 15, 2011.

Advantages of MLDs -

These products come with predefined payoffs and tend to provide good risk adjusted returns on the overall portfolio

These products can be historically back-tested from the time Futures and options were introduced in India (Jan-2001) to ensure that they have high probability of generating the desired returns

These products are all weather products – can be structured depends on the expected market movement.

Page 65 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

As on June 20, 2019, the total rated volume for PP-MLD increased to Rs.450 billion from ~Rs.370 billion at the end of FY19. During Q1FY20 some NBFCs/HFCs/MFIs rated AA- and below raised fund via MLDs which accounted for around 11% of total MLD issuances in Q1FY20. This indicates increasing interest of investors for lower rated MLDs for higher yields/returns.

However, Indian MLD market issuance is minuscule as compared to EU, USA and other Asian countries. At the end of FY19, EU’s structure product market was ~US$ 300 billion, while India’s structured product market (known as MLD) was merely ~US$ 2 billion. In India, MLD issuances in FY19 accounted for merely 1% of AUM of private wealth industry (Top 25 companies AUM as per Asian Private Banker/Wealth Manager report), lead arrangers/distributors of MLDs.

This is primarily due to both demand and supply side expansion. The demand of MLDs grew on account of

-Higher participation from corporates in addition to existing HNIs,

-Increase in ticket size

-Acceptance of MLDs with underlying other than Nifty (i.e. G-sec, corporate bonds etc.)

-Investors’ emphasis on downside protection in volatile market conditions.

The supply side of market grew on the back of

-Rise in number of issuers and

-Increase in number of distributors.

The tenure of these MLDs ranges between 13 to 60 months depending upon issuers funding requirement. The average maturity of MLDs issued has been 2.89 years in FY19 as against average maturity of 2.92 years in FY18.

MLDs are of two types i.e. principal protected (PP) and non-principal protected (NPP). Investor’s inclination towards downside protection continued supporting PP-MLDs share which accounted for 95% of the total issuances in Q1FY20. The average monthly borrowing via PP-MLDs is expected to increase to Rs. 13 billion from ~Rs.10 billion in FY19.

Page 66 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Proportion of MLDs with different underlying index

(Source – CARE Ratings report on Market Linked Debentures: issuance at 5-year high)

Portfolio management services

AMCs in India have started offering strategies with higher flexibility to investors through PMS. As of September 29, 2021, there were 360 portfolio managers registered under the SEBI. This avenue has seen a sharp rise in the asset size, which increased more than thrice to Rs.5,727 billion as of July 2021 from Rs.1,430 billion as of March 2013.

This AUM can be classified under three sections – non-discretionary, discretionary and advisory. Discretionary assets dominated the PMS space with a 84.6% share, followed by advisory (8.8%) and non-discretionary (6.6%).

Page 67 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

WEALTH MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY IN INDIA

Wealth Management, in contextually has been in existence for quarter of a century in India. From serving the Ultra-Rich individuals and families way back in the 1970s to what it is today, Wealth Management has evolved to become a multi-disciplinary approach with multiple solutions. However, from single product advisory to a multi-product, goal-oriented wealth management approach has been a gradual progression.

This line of business function can credit its emergence from the banking system. The banks in the 1970s have functioned merely on deposits and providing credit to investors. With the emergence and expansion of the banking system in the 1970s, India’s savings rate rose from 16% of the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) from early 1970s to 35% of the GDP by 1980. While financial deepening through banks played its vital role, rising per capita income and diminishing share of agriculture in the GDP also helped. This period was aptly called the Golden Era, as far as Indian Savings were concerned.

Banking till 1970s has been mostly about, accumulating and preserving wealth within the boundaries of bank deposits. Early 1970s also saw the rise of Insurance Advisory, specifically life insurance. Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) since its formation in 1956 has played a vital role in insuring lives till then. Apart from mere risk cover, LIC encouraged investors to consider investments through its conventional plans. An Indian Investor till 1980s, considered a bank account and an LIC policy as his means to accumulate wealth. Though the UTI started in 1963, it took UTI 25 years to reach AUM of Rs.67,000 million. With the emergence of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) in 1980s, there emerged a new avenue to make investments, shares or stocks as it is popularly known. However, this was essentially for the risk friendly investors and neither could many comprehend nor have access to. However, it was during the second phase of the Mutual Fund Industry (1987-1993), did High Net worth Investors take cognizance of the Mutual Funds and Capital markets in total. By 1993, the Mutual Funds AUM touched Rs.470,000 million, with the emergence of non-UTI, PSU mutual funds. By then Life Insurance business was open to Non LIC, private participants as well. Banks and financial institutions, found a new revenue model with a combination of Mutual Funds, Insurance and Deposits.

Wealth Management today, has evolved to an end to end Money Management Solutions for every investor ranging from an Individual Investor / family, Corporate Investor, HUF (Hindu Undivided Family) to a Trust. Private Wealth Management involves providing prudent investment solutions, Corporate and Treasury Advisory, Off Shore Advisory and Family Office.

Page 68 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Average Returns by various benchmarks

 

Benchmarks

 

 

10 year Average

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1 year rolling returns)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

G-sec Yield

 

 

7.50%

 

 

Crisil Short Term Bond

8.36%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nifty 50 (Ex dividend)

 

 

12.21%

 

 

Nifty Midcap (Ex Dividend)

15.29%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nifty Small Cap (Ex Dividend)

 

 

14.32%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Data till September 2021

Importance of Wealth Management in India:

The Hurun Research Institute published its annual report in March 2021, where it mentioned that from its survey it found that the average age of an India Millionaire (With net-worth above USD1mn) was 38 years, one year older than last year. This population seeks a wealth manager as they neither have the expertise nor the time to monitor their investments.

Trends within the wealth management space

The wealth management industry is also witnessing market consolidation along its value chain. In addition, private equity funds are increasingly looking to participate in the growth story of Indian wealth management industry.

Other trends in India’s wealth management space

I.There is an increasing trend of ultra HNIs looking at engaging with Family Office set-ups to not only help them in managing investments but also help in ensuring a relevant structure to preserve, grow and manage their wealth for generations to come

II.There is increasing trend of HNIs investing in unlisted equity to be part of the startup / private equity story apart from the quest to have higher anticipated returns on account of unlocking of potential valuations upon listing on stock exchanges.

IFA

With rising inflows in mutual funds, of Rs 36,095 billion AAUM as on August 2021 is seeing a steady increase in new distributors joining. The IFA category has contributed majorly to this growth. If we take into account employees holding Employee Unique Identification Number (EUIN), the total distributors (excluding non-individual distributors) have gone up. This suggests that banks and

Page 69 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

national distributors are ramping up their sales force to cater to the increased demand for mutual funds. The increased demand for mutual funds could be leading to more players taking up MF distribution. B30 distributors are entitled to earn higher commissions as compared to T30 distributors. Many brokers are offering mutual funds to clients, realizing the long-term revenue potential in the form of trail commissions. The distribution space is attracting talent from asset management firms, wealth management/banks and new age robo advisers that are backed by investors.

Direct Equity

In FY20, due to tax cut reforms taken by the government in September 2019, equity as an asset class has outshined all other financial assets in terms of performance this year. As the impact of demonetization started waning and slew of economic reforms were rolled out, bulls took complete control of equity markets.

In FY20 at the end, individual wealth in direct equity decreased by 30.69% to a massive Rs.36,115 billion due to surge in Covid -19 cases and global lockdown and temporary shutoff of all activities which led to steep fall in Stock market.

Table: Composition of Direct Equity holding based on Investor class

 

 

 

 

(In Billion)

Category

FY20 Amount

FY19 Amount

% of Market Capitalization

Y-O-Y (%) Change

 

Promoters

57,615

73,847

51%

-21.98%

 

Institution

44,133

61,563

39%

-28.31%

 

Retail

11,739

15,676

10%

-25.11%

 

Total

1,13,488

1,51,086

100%

-24.89%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-SEBI)

Table: Break-up of Individual Investments in Direct Equity

 

 

 

(In Billion)

 

 

 

 

Category

FY20 Amount

FY19 Amount

Y-O-Y (%) Change

Promoter individual

24,375

36,427

-33%

Retail individual

11,739

15,676

-25%

 

 

 

 

Total

36,115

52,103

-31%

 

 

 

 

(Source-SEBI)

Indian Mutual Fund Industry

SBI Mutual Fund was set up in June 1987, followed by the launch of Canbank Mutual Fund in December 1987. Subsequently, other entities such as Life Insurance Corporation of India (“LIC”), Punjab National Bank (“PNB”), Indian Bank, Bank of India, General Insurance Corporation of India

Page 70 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

(“GIC”) and Bank of Baroda (“BoB”) opened their mutual fund houses, taking the industry assets to ₹470 billion by the end of 1993.

Figure: The chart sets forth a summary of the evolution of the Indian Mutual Fund Industry:

Structure of mutual funds in India

The structure of mutual funds in India is a three-tier one. There are three distinct entities involved in the process – the sponsor, trustees and the asset management company (which oversees the fund management). The structure of Mutual Funds has come into existence due to SEBI (Securities and Exchange Board of India) Mutual Fund Regulations, 1996. Under these regulations, a Mutual Fund is created as a Public Trust.

Asset Management Companies:

Asset management companies are the third layer in the structure of Mutual Funds. The asset management company acts as the fund manager or as an investment manager for the trust. A small

Page 71 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

fee is paid to the AMC for managing the fund. The AMC is responsible for all the fund-related activities. It initiates various schemes and launches the same. The AMC is bound to manage funds and provide services to the investor. It solicits these services with other elements like brokers, auditors, bankers, registrars, lawyers, etc. and works with them. To ensure that there is no conflict between the AMCs, there are certain restrictions imposed on the business activities of the companies.

Types of Mutual Funds

A mutual fund is a professionally-managed investment scheme that raises capital or investment from a group of people and uses that pooled capital to invest in different types of securities like equities, bonds, money market instruments and/or other securities. Mutual funds can be classified under various categories, based on their structure, investment style and the investment objective.

Types of Mutual Funds Based on Structure

Open-end Fund: An open-end fund is a mutual fund scheme that is available for subscription and redemption on every business day throughout the year. These schemes are perpetual and do not have any maturity date.

Closed-end Fund: A closed-end fund is a scheme which has a specified tenor and a fixed maturity date and is open for subscription only during the initial offer period. Units of Closed-end funds can be redeemed only on maturity. Hence, the units of a closed-end fund are compulsorily listed on a stock exchange after the new fund offer, and traded on the stock exchange just like other stocks. This provides the investors an option to exit from the scheme before the maturity by selling the units on the exchange.

Type of Mutual Funds Based on Investment Objectives and Underlying Securities

Equity Funds / Growth Funds invest a predominant share of the corpus in equity securities, with the main objective of providing capital appreciation over the medium to long term investment horizon. They are high-risk funds and the returns are linked to the performance of the capital markets. There are different types of equity funds such as diversified funds, sector specific funds and index based funds.

oDiversified Funds have a portfolio comprising of investments in companies spread across sectors and market capitalization.

oSector Funds invest primarily in equity shares of companies in a certain identified business sector or industry. While these funds may give higher returns during certain periods, they are riskier as compared to diversified funds given the dependence of their performance on a particular sector or industry.

Page 72 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

oIndex Funds invest in the same pattern, that is same securities and in the same proportion, as popular stock market indices like CNX Nifty Index and S&P BSE Sensex. The value of the index fund varies in proportion to the benchmark index.

oTax Saving Funds are diversified equity funds with the added feature of tax benefits to investors under section 80C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Investors in these funds have a lock- in period of three years.

Debt Fund / Fixed Income Funds invest predominantly in rated debt or fixed income securities like corporate bonds, debentures, government securities, commercial paper and other money market instruments. These are less risky when compared with equity funds.

oLiquid Funds / Money Market Funds invest in highly liquid money market instruments and provide easy liquidity. Liquid funds are short duration funds and typically used by corporate, institutional investors and business houses for deploying surplus liquidity for a short period.

oGilt Funds invest in central and state Government securities. Gilt funds have the lowest credit risk.

Balanced / Hybrid Funds invest both in equity shares and debt (fixed income) instruments and strive to provide both growth and regular income.

Exchange Traded Funds (“ETFs”): track an index, a commodity or a basket of assets as closely as possible, but trade like shares on the stock exchanges. They are backed by physical holdings of the commodity, and invest in stocks of companies, precious metals or currencies.

Gold Funds are schemes that mainly invest in gold ETFs and other related assets. Unlike for gold ETFs, investing in gold funds does not require a demat account. Further, gold funds do not directly invest in physical gold but take the same position indirectly by investing in gold ETFs.

Types of Mutual Funds Based on Investment Style

Actively Managed Fund: These funds are actively managed by a fund manager who is responsible for curating and monitoring the portfolio. The fund manager is responsible for buying, holding and selling stocks, backed by analytical and technical research and expertise, based on the performance of the stock and the portfolio as well as the investment thesis of the fund or scheme. The fund manager would take the decisions to buy or sell or hold securities based on his assessment and analysis of the markets and the portfolio performance along with the core investment philosophy of the fund.

Page 73 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Passively Managed Funds: Passive investment strategy refers to the strategy of optimizing returns over a long term by mimicking the benchmark index. This strategy is based on an efficient market hypothesis which states ‘beating the market’ is virtually impossible since security prices at all times reflect all relevant information, owing to stock market efficiency. Thus, with beating the market not an option, matching the market returns emerges as the best option. A passively managed fund, though managed by a fund manager, follows a market index in its composition.

The scheme’s portfolio mirrors the selected benchmark index and thus comprises of the same securities as in the benchmark index and in exactly the same proportion. The fund manager thus is a passive investor as the security transaction decisions (buy/hold/sell) are based on the benchmark index.

Penetration, Current Structure and Trend in Mutual Fund Industry

(Source-AMFI)

Average Assets managed by the Indian mutual fund industry have grown from Rs. 23,250 billion in January 2018 to Rs. 37,408 billion in September 2021. That represents a 60.89% growth in assets over January 2018.

Growth in Assets (Rs. in Billion)

(Source-AMFI)

Page 74 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

The value of assets held by individual investors in mutual funds increased from Rs.14,320 billion in August 2020 to Rs.19,401 billion in August 2021, an absolute increase of 35.48%.

The value of Institutional assets increased to Rs.16,694 billion in August 2021 from Rs. 13,461 billion in August 2020.

Scheme wise Composition of Assets

The proportionate share of equity-oriented schemes is now 46.0% of the industry assets in August 2021, up from 40.1% in August 2020.

The proportionate share of debt-oriented schemes is 27.7% of industry assets in August 2021, down from 30.3% in August 2020.

Investor Categories across Scheme Types

Individual investors now hold a marginally higher share of industry assets, i.e. 53.7% in August 2021, compared with 51.5% in August 2020.

Institutional investors account for 46.3% of the assets, of which corporates are 95%. The rest are Indian and foreign institutions and banks.

Composition of Investors’ Holdings

Individual investors primarily hold equity-oriented schemes while institutions hold liquid and debt- oriented schemes.

75% of individual investor assets are held in equity-oriented schemes.

68% of institutions assets are held in liquid/money markets schemes and debt-oriented schemes.

Growth in B30 Assets

Page 75 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

(Source-AMFI)

*T30 refers to the top 30 geographical locations in India and B30 refers to the locations beyond the top 30.

16% of the assets of the mutual fund industry came from B30 locations in July 2021.

Assets from B30 locations increased from Rs.5,664 billion in July 2021 to Rs.5,860 billion in August 2021, representing an increase of 3%.

Top 5 States in Each Scheme Category as on August 2021

(Source-AMFI)

(Source-AMFI)

Page 76 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

(Source-AMFI)

(Source-AMFI)

Maharashtra leads in the entire scheme category followed by New Delhi except in Equity oriented Scheme. In Debt oriented schemes Gujarat ranks fourth while it ranks second in Equity oriented schemes. Karnataka ranks third in Liquid, Debt oriented schemes, ETF’s and Equity oriented schemes it ranks fourth. West Bengal ranks fifth in Equity oriented schemes and Fourth in ETF’s.

State-Wise AUM Data

(Source-AMFI)

Page 77 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

(Source-AMFI)

As can been seen from above graph Maharashtra contributes highest AUM as % of GDP which is 59.8% as compared to North Eastern regions like Manipur which contributes 2.3% the least as on August 2021.

(Source-AMFI)

(Source-AMFI)

Page 78 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

When it comes to per capita AUM, New Delhi ranks 1st with assets of Rs. 1,52,425 per person. New Delhi tops the list of per capita AUM followed by Goa, Maharashtra, Chandigarh and Haryana. While Manipur has the lowest per capita AUM of Rs.2,106 as on August 2021. The variation happens because of population in each state. States with lower populations have higher per capita AUMs.

Top 20 States –AUM Composition August 2021

(Source-AMFI)

%share of the top 20 states in the total industry AUM is indicated in brackets next to each state respectively.

The AUM composition gives us an idea of various schemes that contribute to the AUM. Haryana has its largest assets under debt oriented schemes while Jharkhand and Bihar have the same in equity oriented schemes.

Investor Type-wise Composition of Mutual Fund Assets

Page 79 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Individual investors now hold a higher share of industry’s assets, i.e. 53.7% in August 2021, compared with 46.2% in March 2015.

(Source-AMFI)

*Institutions include domestic and foreign institutions and banks.

B30 has a more balanced mix than T30

(Source-AMFI)

In August 2021, 71% of assets from B30 locations were in equity schemes. T30 location, equity – oriented schemes accounted for 41%.

Increasing Share of Equity based Fund in Asset class over the years

Page 80 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Equity funds have increased their share by approx. 14.1% points from Mar-15 to Aug-21, driven by strong growth in equity markets and steady inflows.

(Source-AMFI)

Equities contributed about 46.0% of the total mutual fund AMC asset size as on August 2021 up from 31.9% 6.4 years ago.

Investors – Overall Composition

An individual or an entity facilitating buying and selling of units of mutual fund by investors. A distributor earns upfront/trail commission for bringing in investors into the mutual fund schemes.

A Direct plan in which investor buy directly from the mutual fund company (usually from their own website) whereas a Regular plan investor buy through an advisor, broker or distributor (intermediary). In a regular plan, the mutual fund company pays commission to the intermediary. This is then recovered as an expense from the plan. In mutual fund, the expense ratio is higher for a regular plan. Mutual fund industry saw its assets base increase from Rs.21,360 billion in March 2018 to Rs. 36,594 billion in August 2021 adding more than Rs. 15,234 billion in 3.4 years.

Key Drivers of growth for Wealth Management Industry

Increasing population of affluent clients with rising income levels- With expanding economy, income of the middle class and the investable assets of the UHNI in the country have increased dramatically over the last few years. This, along with higher financial literacy and growing customer

Page 81 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

awareness, has led to an increase in demand for wealth products. India is one of the world’s fastest growing UHNI populations both in terms of the number of individuals and the wealth levels. The rise in UHNI population has been partly driven by e-commerce start-ups and rising income levels.

With increase in GDP/Adult of developed nations such as United States, Switzerland, Australia, wealth/GDP of respective country also increased. While India’s GDP is expected to grow at much faster rate, it is estimated that is will witness similar increase in its wealth/GDP as was observed in developed nations.

Increase in wealth allocated towards financial products- Individuals and investors are increasingly moving away from traditional physical investments such as real estate and gold and making higher allocations into financial assets such as equity, bonds and alternate investments, thereby creating higher potential for wealth products. This coupled with ease in accessibility of different investment products on one platform will also help drive growth.

A large fraction of the wealth of Indian households is in the form of physical assets (in particular, gold and real estate). The average Indian household holds 84% of its wealth in real estate and other physical goods, 11% in gold and the residual 5% in financial assets (Source-www.rbi.org.in). Financial savings has higher proportion to household’s savings in advanced economies as they are more likely to finance home purchasing with a mortgage, and allocate a sizeable fraction of their wealth to retirement savings over the course of their lifetime. Individuals and investors in India are increasingly moving away from traditional physical investments such as real estate and gold and allocating higher proportion of their investment into financial assets such as equity, bonds and alternate investments, thereby creating higher potential for wealth products. Lower expected returns on physical assets have been one of the major factors for shift in investments preference of investors towards financial products. With stable gold price and falling real estate price, investment in physical savings has declined. Investment attractiveness towards fixed deposit has also declined as fixed deposit returns have fallen over the past three years. Whereas, Nifty index rose, driving the shift of household savings preference from physical assets towards financial products.

Financial savings shifting to mutual funds- Gradual pick-up in economic growth, benign inflation, and diminishing attractiveness of gold and real estate as investment options to lead to a surge in household financial savings in India. This financial savings will find its way into mutual funds, owing to increased awareness of the product.

Low penetration and strong fundamentals to aid industry growth- Despite growth in assets, India accounts for less than 1.5% share of the global mutual fund industry. Furthermore, mutual fund penetration, as measured by AUM-to-GDP ratio, was a mere 16% in 2020 as compared with the global average of 63%.

Increased reach of mutual funds beyond top 30 cities- Mutual funds are expanding their distribution reach and focusing on securing customers from smaller markets. Beyond top 15 (B15) cities have seen faster growth in assets in past three Fiscals ended March 2017, at 30%

Page 82 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

CAGR, compared with top 15 (T15) cities (27% CAGR). Further, individual investors’ (retail and HNIs) assets grew even faster in B15 cities at 35% CAGR compared with 28% CAGR in T15 cities. This growth can be attributed to increasing digitization along with government policies like allocation of expenses for investor education. Furthermore, SEBI has incentivized fund houses to garner assets from tier II and III cities by allowing them to charge an additional expense ratio of up to 30 bps on inflows above the defined limits (30% of gross new inflows or 15% of average AUM for a scheme, whichever is higher) from beyond T15 cities. As per SEBI circular SEBI/HO/IMD/DF2/CIR/P/2018/16 dated 02.02.2018, the terms and definition of “15 cities”, “T15” and “B15” are substituted with “30 cities”, “T30” and “B30” respectively, with effect from April 1, 2018.

Retail participation increasing with rise in SIP investments- Retail investor folios, which were on a decline post the financial crisis of 2008, reversed course in the past few Fiscals. Due to political stability, low inflation, central bank rate cuts, higher than expected monsoons, and tax cut by government for corporates led retail investors to increase their allocation to equity mutual funds. Mutual Fund SIPs accounts stood at 43.2 million and the total amount collected through SIP during August 2021 was ₹99.23 billion & Total amount contributed in FY22 was ₹461.03 billion.

(Source-AMFI) * Data till August 2021.

Supportive policies

The government and SEBI have over the years come out with a number of regulations to educate investors, simplify products and lower costs, with the eventual aim of enhancing the acceptance of mutual funds as an investment avenue and protecting the interest of investors. While some of these policies, such as banning entry load (2009), mandating exit loads to be credited back to the scheme (2012), and mandating AMCs to offer a direct plan option with lower expense ratio for investors who do not wish to invest through distributors (2013), have led to short-term gyrations. But these have contributed in making the sector more attractive.

In April 2016, the RBI asked banks that currently offer investment advisory services through an internal department to reorganize their operations within three years and set up a

Page 83 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

subsidiary for investment advisory services. This is to ensure an arm’s length distance between banking activities and investment advisory services. Banks will need specific approval from the RBI to set up the subsidiary. The subsidiary would have to be registered with SEBI and would be subsequently regulated by SEBI. In order to promote investors participation, government / regulators are boosting investor’s confidences to participate in equity / debt market by increased focus on client centricity, fiduciary responsibility and compliance. Regulatory have been more stringent in their requirements regarding advisor qualifications, infrastructure, risk profiling and suitability criteria.

In 2011, SEBI proposed a self-regulatory organization (SRO) for the Indian wealth management sector that would help regulate business and serve as a medium for SEBI to implement various wealth management initiatives. To enhance the penetration of mutual funds in the country, SEBI sought to increase the sales in the B15 location through the commission structure. In September 2012, SEBI allowed fund houses to charge an additional 30 basis points on daily net assets in the total expense ratio, should the new inflows from B15 cities be at least 30% of the gross new inflows in the scheme or 15% of the average assets under management, whichever is higher. Note: As per SEBI circular

SEBI/HO/IMD/DF2/CIR/P/2018/16 dated 02.02.2018, the terms and definition of “15 cities”, “T15” and “B15” are substituted with “30 cities”, “T30” and “B30” respectively, with effect from April 1, 2018.

SEBI's recent guidelines on consolidation and merger of mutual fund schemes will make it simple for the investors to compare various mutual fund schemes being offered by the fund houses. Moreover, it will reduce the confusion and make it simple to compare performance among a level-playing field.

The implementation of various reforms such as GST, RERA, new insolvency and bankruptcy code and recapitalization of banks among others are likely to shift informal sectors into the formal economy and hence, boost GDP growth and individual wealth in the medium to long term.

The Indian government’s financial inclusion drive and the growth of small rural banks are bringing large number of unbanked people into the formal banking system. This is reflected in the growth in Jan Dhan accounts and bank deposits.

Equity mutual funds perceived as long-term wealth creators- Equity mutual funds have created wealth in multiples for investors over the long term. For e.g., ₹ 1,000 invested in equity funds in

1999, would have grown 46 times, compared with 29.4 times and 22.0 times of the Nifty 500, Nifty 50 and S&P BSE Sensex indices, respectively till September 2021.

SEBI drive to push mutual fund products in B30 cities and beyond in the last five years has begun to show results. Asset management companies (AMCs) have increased their focus on rural markets, which is reflecting in the numbers – both in terms of investors and assets under management.

Page 84 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Campaigns like the Mutual Fund Sahi Hai drive have been immensely successful in creating awareness about the benefits of investing in MFs across India.

Rural recovery brings a lot of good news for the Indian economy as rural demand constitutes a major portion of overall consumption demand in the country. If consumption from vicinity retains its momentum, it can be a force multiplier for India’s GDP growth in the coming years.

Page 85 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

CLASSIFICATION & CHARACTERISTICS OF ULTRA HNI & HNI

Global wealth is projected to rise by 39% over the next five years, reaching USD 583 trillion by 2025. Low- and middle-income countries are responsible for 42% of the growth, although they account for just 33% of current wealth. Wealth per adult is projected to increase by 31%, passing the watershed mark of USD 100,000. The number of millionaires will also grow markedly over the next five years, reaching 84 million by CY25, while the number of UHNWIs should reach 344,000 by CY25.

Wealth Management to benefit the most due to equity component in wealth to GDP.

In order to analyze the distribution of wealth, the data have been segregated into four wealth ranges: 1) below 10,000 dollars; 2) 10,000−100,000 dollars; 3) 100,000−1,000,000 dollars; 4) above 1 million dollars. Since the first issue of the Global Wealth Report in 2010, the composition of the pyramid has remained largely stable. The only wealth segment with an unbroken spell of expansion and wealth accumulation is the top tier, representing dollar millionaires.

World wealth map 2020

(Source- Global Wealth Report 2021)

The Global Wealth Pyramid end-2020

(Source- Global Wealth Report 2021)

Page 86 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

UHNWIs by region: 2020 and 2025

(Source- Global Wealth Report 2021)

Percentage Wealth Share Of Top 1%, Selected Countries and Years

Page 87 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

HNWI financial wealth by region (USD trillions), 2012–2019

(Source-World Wealth Report 2020)

Individual taxpayers declaring Gross Total Income more than Rs 10 Million

 

Assessment Year

 

 

Financial Year

 

 

Number of returns

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2018-19

 

 

2017-18

 

 

97,689

 

2017-18

 

2016-17

 

81,344

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016-17

 

 

2015-16

 

 

67,783

 

2015-16

 

2014-15

 

59,830

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014-15

 

 

2013-14

 

 

48,417

 

2013-14

 

2012-13

 

44,078

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2012-13

 

 

2011-12

 

 

36,690

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source: Income Tax India)

Individual taxpayers declaring Gross Total Income more than Rs 10 Million have increased from 36,690 in AY 2012 - 13 to 97,689 in AY 2018-19 with an increase of over 17.73% CAGR, considering the same growth rate Individual taxpayers declaring Gross Total Income more than Rs 10 Million will reach to approx. 3,00,000 by AY 2025-26.

Page 88 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

GLOBAL OVERVIEW

Global wealth is projected to rise by 39% over the next five years, reaching USD 583 trillion by 2025. Low- and middle-income countries are responsible for 42% of the growth, although they account for just 33% of current wealth. Wealth per adult is projected to increase by 31%, passing the watershed mark of USD 100,000. The number of millionaires will also grow markedly over the next five years, reaching 84 million, while the number of UHNWIs should reach 344,000.

Wealth Management to benefit the most due to equity component in wealth to GDP.

Regional composition of global wealth distribution in 2020

(Source- Global Wealth Report 2021)

Global Wealth Distribution

(Source- Global Wealth Report 2021)

Page 89 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Number of millionaires in 2020 and 2025 (regions and selected countries)

 

Country

 

 

Number (thousand)

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2025

 

 

(%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

 

21,951

28,055

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

China

 

 

 

5,279

 

10,172

 

 

93

 

 

Japan

 

 

3,662

5,411

48

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

France

 

 

 

2,469

 

4,201

 

 

70

 

 

Canada

 

 

1,682

2,981

77

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Germany

 

 

 

2,953

 

4,240

 

 

44

 

 

Australia

 

 

1,805

3,071

70

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United Kingdom

 

 

 

2,491

 

3,711

 

 

49

 

 

Korea

 

 

1,051

1,772

69

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spain

 

 

 

1,147

 

1,804

 

 

57

 

 

Netherlands

 

 

1,039

1,666

60

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Italy

 

 

 

1,480

 

2,060

 

 

39

 

 

India

 

 

698

1,269

82

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Switzerland

 

 

 

1,035

 

1,596

 

 

54

 

 

Taiwan (Chinese Taipei)

 

 

609

1,031

69

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hong Kong SAR

 

 

 

520

 

831

 

 

60

 

 

Belgium

 

 

515

786

53

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Denmark

 

 

 

307

 

560

 

 

82

 

 

Sweden

 

 

570

809

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Austria

 

 

 

346

 

577

 

 

67

 

 

Russia

 

 

269

455

69

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mexico

 

 

 

264

 

434

 

 

64

 

 

Singapore

 

 

270

437

62

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brazil

 

 

 

207

 

361

 

 

74

 

 

Poland

 

 

149

295

98

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Africa

 

 

 

276

 

483

 

 

75

 

 

Asia-Pacific

 

 

9,656

15,291

58

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

China

 

 

 

5,279

 

10,172

 

 

93

 

 

Europe

 

 

15,784

24,491

55

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

India

 

 

 

698

 

1,269

 

 

82

 

 

Latin America

 

 

752

1,262

68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North America

 

 

 

23,638

 

31,045

 

 

31

 

 

World

 

 

56,084

84,014

50

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source- Global Wealth Report 2021)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 90 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Emerging Trends in the global wealth management industry

Regulation and compliance

Increasing regulatory complexity-The global financial crisis paved the way for increased regulatory scrutiny and tighter oversight of the wealth management industry. It is not just the sheer volume of new regulations, but also uncertainties regarding the interpretation of regulations, delayed timelines and inconsistencies between regulators that are materially increasing the risk of non-compliance as well as challenging existing business models. One of the biggest challenges that wealth managers will continue to face is keeping up with the dynamic regulatory environment in their home jurisdictions and in international markets.

Focus on international tax transparency-The overall stance on tax transparency is becoming more intense, with supranational organizations driving regulatory initiatives. Going forward, international efforts to reduce tax arbitrage and improve transparency will accelerate and it will become harder to avoid taxation. Going forward, there will be more regulatory requirements that wealth managers will need to meet. The stream of new and revised regulations will continue, triggered by efforts to harmonize national regulations globally to ensure a level playing field.

Changing client needs

New generation of client- The wealth management industry is witnessing a phase of change as its largest investor segment, the baby boomers (born between 1946 and 1965), is in the retirement phase and assets are being transferred to the next generation of investors: Gen-X (born between 1966 and 1980) and Gen-Y/millennials (born after 1980). Currently, millennials are the largest and fastest-growing adult segment across the globe and represent the greatest opportunity for the wealth management industry. Millennials are not only growing in number, but also accumulating assets at an impressive rate. In fact, millennials are entering their prime earnings years and also have the prospect of large inheritances. They have the potential to become the wealthiest generation in history. Notably, this group of investors is different from their predecessors in terms of attitudes toward managing their finances and expectations in relation to client experience. While baby boomers were more keen on investing in stocks and particularly interested in diversifying their assets, millennials tend to hold more cash (40% of assets are in cash) and are distrustful of the stock market (90% of millennials are intimidated by the stock market) mainly on account of their experience with the global financial crisis. Moreover, millennials’ investment objectives are diverse and vary across asset classes as well as regions.

Empowered clients- Client needs and expectations are changing dramatically with regards to client experience, quality of service and delivery channels. The industry is witnessing a change in demand

Page 91 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

for products and services as well as preferred channels for customer engagement. Digital capabilities are at the top of the list of wealth management clients’ must-haves. Clients are increasingly demanding that wealth management firms offer more interactions — from account opening to the provision of advice — through digital channels. The new wave of empowered clients is challenging the status quo in wealth management.

Customer loyalty is declining - Customer loyalty is declining as clients have become wary of their financial service providers following the financial crisis and barriers in switching between financial firms have reduced. According to industry data, 73% of wealth management clients have relationships with multiple wealth managers and 4 out of 10 clients are open to switching wealth managers. This represents incremental revenue opportunity of US$ 175b–US$ 200b (based on the fact that global wealth managers manage client assets worth ~US$ 120t) for firms willing to make strategic investments to improve their client experience. Moreover, trust and price sensitivity issues have led some new generation investors to explore do-it-yourself investing. This trend is supported by the rise of automated invested platforms (robo-advisors).

Clients are eager for a new level of public transparency- Investors have overwhelmingly identified transparency of portfolio performance and fees as one of the key requisites in the rapidly transforming wealth management space. However, the traditional views of transparency are no longer enough and investors are demanding a new level of public transparency. Clients are eager to rate their advisors and connect with like-minded clients in public forums to exchange ideas and share positive and negative experiences. For instance, social media can be used as a platform to review or rate advisors.

Changing fee-structure preferences- Currently, the global wealth management industry follows a transaction-based (i.e., commissions) or an asset-based compensation model. However, client preference for fixed fees is rising, while preference toward both asset-based fees and commissions is on the decline. Furthermore, clients are becoming less sure about how they want to be charged in every single region.

Competitive environment

The competitive landscape for wealth managers is multidimensional, involving traditional and non- traditional players. In a study as per research, more than half of the respondent wealth managers (52%) agreed that the industry is facing significant competitive pressures.

Traditional players rebalancing structures- Several players are rebalancing their international wealth management operations. While some wealth management players are focusing on high-growth

Page 92 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

markets, such as Asia-Pacific, others are exiting the international wealth management industry entirely.

List of Top Global Players

Following are the Top 10 asset and wealth managers in the world ranked by total AUM. Blackrock established in 1988, is the world’s largest asset manager with assets under management of more than US $9.0 trillion. Headquartered in New York, it has more than 70 offices in 30 countries and employs approximately 12,000 people. Vanguard Group, Headquartered in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania, is the second largest investment company with more than US$ 7 trillion in global assets under management. It is the largest mutual fund provider and second largest ETFs provider in the world.

 

Rank

 

 

Company

 

 

Country

 

 

Asset under Management

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(US$ Trillion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

 

BlackRock

 

 

US

 

 

9.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

 

The Vanguard Group

 

US

7.20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

 

Charles Schwab Corporation

 

 

US

 

 

7.07

 

4

 

Fidelity Investments

 

US

3.80

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

 

 

State Street Global Advisors

 

 

US

 

 

3.50

 

6

 

Allianz

 

Germany

2.89

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

 

 

J.P. Morgan Asset Management

 

 

US

 

 

2.80

 

8

 

Capital Group

 

US

2.30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9

 

 

BNY Mellon Investment management

 

 

US

 

 

2.20

 

10

 

Amundi Asset Management

 

France

1.90

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source- mutualfunddirectory.org)

Page 93 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

OUTLOOK FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY IN INDIA-OVERALL

Indian household savings have been witnessing some considerable structural shifts of late. Households in India have historically been quite risk averse and wary of investing their savings into volatile or uncertain return-based assets. A pursuit of safe bets has always driven India towards making investments in unproductive assets like gold. This pattern is slowly changing over time, especially since demonetization in November 2016. Also, the country has seen a major shift in attitude from Capital preservation to wealth creation from FY17.

With a likely growth rate of India’s GDP projected at 9.2% in 2022 the country will remain a key growth driver of global economy. Against this backdrop, individual wealth in India is expected to grow at a CAGR of 11.77% till FY25 and is likely to nearly double to Rs. 811,293 billion by FY25. The GDP of India is estimated to be around US$ 4.2 Trillion by 2025 as projected by IMF.

GDP Forecast in Absolute terms (USD Trillion)

 

Particulars

 

 

2018

 

 

2019

 

 

2020

 

 

2021F

 

 

2022F

 

 

2023F

 

 

2024F

 

 

2025F

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GDP, current

 

 

2,701

 

 

2,871

 

 

2,709

 

 

3,050

 

 

3,310

 

 

3,590

 

 

3,880

 

 

4,199

 

 

prices

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source: IMF) *F-Forecasted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In the next five years, financial assets will witness much faster growth rate as compared to physical assets. As far as individual contribution is concerned, financial asset will form almost 63% of the total individual assets by FY25. Physical assets will be restricted to 37% of the total wealth.

Table: Individual Wealth Estimation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In Billion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Category

 

 

FY20 Amount

 

 

FY25

 

 

CAGR (%)

 

 

Proportion

 

 

Proportion FY25

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

FY20

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financial Assets

2,62,912

 

5,12,157

 

14.27

 

56.5%

 

63.1%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Physical Assets

 

 

2,02,282

 

 

2,99,136

 

 

8.14

 

 

43.5%

 

 

36.9%

 

 

Total

4,65,194

 

8,11,293

 

11.77

 

100.0%

 

100.0%

 

Page 94 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

(Source-Karvy India Wealth Report 2020)

The share of financial assets is increasing in total assets gradually from 56.5% to 63.1%.

Projected financial wealth – asset class wise distribution in FY25

Financial assets are likely to almost double by FY25 to reach a figure of Rs. 5,12,157 billion in FY25 as compared to Rs. 2,62,912 billion in FY20. Faster growth in Direct Equity will be the major driver of such growth. Rising wave of mutual funds will also supplement this uptrend. We therefore expect that by FY25, the share of financial assets in the investment will rise to 63.1% from 56.5% in FY20.

Table: Projected financial wealth – asset class wise distribution in FY25

 

 

 

 

(In Billion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Category

FY20

FY25

CAGR %

Proportion FY20

Proportion FY25

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Deposits & Bonds

48,691

78,357

9.98%

18.52%

15.30%

Direct Equity

36,115

97,319

21.93%

13.74%

19.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance

38,020

68,895

12.63%

14.46%

13.45%

Saving Deposits

37,455

53,762

7.50%

14.25%

10.50%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

23,497

33,933

7.63%

8.94%

6.63%

Provident Fund

20,438

36,720

12.43%

7.77%

7.17%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mutual Funds

11,909

27,151

17.92%

4.53%

5.30%

NRI Deposits

10,326

17,164

10.70%

3.93%

3.35%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unlisted Equity

13,032

60,035

35.73%

4.96%

11.72%

Small Savings

9,836

15,070

8.91%

3.74%

2.94%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Deposits

2,118

3,036

7.47%

0.81%

0.59%

Pension Funds

9,017

15,289

11.14%

3.43%

2.99%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alternative Investments

2,000

4,247

16.25%

0.76%

0.83%

International assets

458

1,181

20.86%

0.17%

0.23%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

2,62,912

5,12,157

14.27%

100.00%

100.00%

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Source-Karvy India Wealth Report 2020)

Page 95 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Projected physical wealth – asset class wise distribution in FY24

Despite rise in share of financial assets, physical assets will remain resilient to an extent. Individual wealth in physical assets is likely to grow by 33.86% to around Rs. 270,783 billion in FY24 from Rs. 2,02,282 billion in FY20. Despite low growth, real estate and gold will remain the most favored asset classes in the overall physical assets pie.

Meanwhile, performance of physical assets will remain subdued as compared to financial assets primarily due to factors like attitudinal shift, liquidity, faster growth of equity markets among others.

Table: Projected Physical Wealth – Asset Class wise distribution in FY24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(In Billion)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Category

 

 

FY20

 

 

FY24

 

 

CAGR %

 

 

Proportion

 

 

Proportion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FY20

 

 

FY24

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

 

 

1,09,500

 

 

1,31,848

 

 

4.75%

 

 

54.13%

 

 

48.69%

 

 

Real Estate

80,145

 

1,18,247

 

10.21%

 

39.62%

 

43.67%

 

 

 

Diamond

 

 

8,304

 

 

14,318

 

 

14.59%

 

 

4.11%

 

 

5.29%

 

 

Silver

2,854

 

3,718

 

6.84%

 

1.41%

 

1.37%

 

 

 

Platinum

 

 

82

 

 

129

 

 

11.99%

 

 

0.04%

 

 

0.05%

 

 

Others Gems and Jewellery

1,394

 

2,520

 

15.95%

 

0.69%

 

0.93%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

2,02,282

 

 

2,70,783

 

 

7.56%

 

 

100.00%

 

 

100.00%

 

 

(Source-Karvy India Wealth Report 2020)

Wealth held by individuals is expected to reach approx. Rs. 8,11,293 billion by FY25 at a steady CAGR of 11.77% per annum.

The implementation of various reforms such as GST, RERA, new insolvency and bankruptcy code and recapitalization of banks among others are likely to shift informal sectors into the formal economy and hence, boost GDP growth and individual wealth in the medium to long term.

There is increasing trend of HNIs investing in unlisted equity to be part of the startup / private equity story apart from the quest to have higher anticipated returns on account of unlocking of potential valuations upon listing on stock exchanges.

There is an increasing trend of ultra HNIs looking at engaging with Family Office set-ups to not only help them in managing investments but also help in ensuring a relevant structure to preserve, grow and manage their wealth for generations to come.

Direct Equity Investments are expected to be the main growth drivers for the future and are expected to grow at a CAGR of more than 28.1% over the next 5 years.

Page 96 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

Potential impact of robo-advisors on the wealth management space

Some traditional players have been downplaying the impact of robo-advisors. However these new digital entrants have been able to develop a streamlined digital experience for clients, which had been largely lacking in traditional wealth managers’ digital offerings. This combined with increased transparency and lower fees have the ability to make wealth advice economically feasible for the mass market.

Robo-advisors are swarming into the wealth management industry. The current market share of robo-advisor firms is marginal as they have only gained a miniscule share of (AUM) globally but several companies already have over US$ 1b of assets under management. Several research studies forecast that robo-advisors are going to witness significant growth going forward as these firms have managed to do in a couple of years what the incumbent wealth management industry has failed to accomplish since its inception, i.e., make quality financial advice available across demographics at an affordable cost. Robo-advisors will be key to unlocking access to the mass market services, which, in turn, would help in growing the overall wealth management market. Moreover, these firms have received strong funding support from venture capital funds. According to a study by MyPrivateBanking Research hybrid robo-advisors are expected to grow by size to US$ 3.7 trillion of assets globally by 2020. The study predicts that the total market size for hybrid robo-advisors will further increase to US$ 16.3 trillion by 2025, which will be 10% of total investable wealth around the world by that date. In contrast pure robo-advisors (fully automated) are likely to hold only 1.6% of the total global wealth by the middle of the next decade.

Robo-advisors steps to streamline the client online experience, provide greater transparency and improve the economics for the mass segments are irreversible and they are making traditional financial advisers rethink their business models. According to a research by Accenture, robo advisors could result in possible fee reduction of as much as 70% for some services. Traditional advisors will need to ensure that their service offering is commensurate with the fees tagged to it. Moreover, robo-advisors will also force traditional advisers to increase focus on their digital channels.

Conclusion

India has the lowest mutual fund penetration globally. The total AUM to GDP ratio of India stands at a mere 16%, way below the global average of 63%. Countries like the US have AUM to GDP ratios of over 100%. So, the mutual fund industry in the country provides huge scope for growth and development. Real estate and gold have become less attractive forms of investments post demonetisation. Even the reduction in bank deposit rates in the past year has led to a shift in investment to mutual funds and the stock markets.

Financial Assets are expected to reach Rs.512 trillion by FY25 at a CAGR of 14.27% and Physical Assets would grow at 7.56% CAGR to reach Rs.270 Trillion by FY24.

Page 97 of 98

RHP Final Wealth Management Industry Research Report 2021

India is expected to be the fourth largest private wealth market globally by 2028.

Also, the government's efforts to increase banking penetration through Jan Dhan Yojana and higher digitization are also expected to boost financial savings. Factors such as favourable demographic profile with a young working population, rise in income levels, increasing financial literacy and retail participation and buoyancy in capital markets supporting equity AUM, are expected to drive the growth of the mutual fund industry in the long term.

Page 98 of 98